|
|
HARMONY OF PERFECT WORLDS
from direct percertion of mystery
Right physics as a play of higher perfect worlds.
Dynamics of our worlds is only a reflection of this play.
Physics old and new is derived from practically nothing.
Predictions of new physics proved by experiments.
Annotation - a concise description of the key on a one page:
THERE IS ONE KEY TO ANY PROBLEM BECAUSE
PHYSICS generated by interaction of four worlds with different signs of time and causality
PREDICTS LOCAL COSMOLOGIES
THAT REVEAL (trough some special procedures)
THE WORLD BEFORE BIG BANG,
OUR DEEP I,
GOD,
THE LAST UNITY
OF ABOVE REALMS.
Through the interaction with local cosmologies we can
Read the program of evolution,
Change yourselves,
Arrange dialogue with God,
Know thw last meaning of our world.
On any of those levels we have many new effects and new apparatus
Up to the SHIP FOR THE FLIGHT
TO OTHER WORLDS.
It is the science = art = religion = mysticism of near future.
We already have those “new” apparatus in our brain
And because of this traditional ideals and higher beings
(first principles, natural spirits, angels, God)
are so real as any stone on a road.
The correct unique reconstruction of these ideals and beings
Generate below any world we like and any physics we like.
THIS UNIQUE RECONSRTUCTION
OF HIGHER DYNAMICS (proved by evolution and history
that follow from this dynamics) is based on new techniques:
1. TECHNIQUE OF EQUALIZING THE ROLES OF OPPOSITIONS
2. TECHNIQUE OF CONSTRUCTION THE PLAN OF THE WORLD
These techniques need a translation between higher and lower languages.
These translation is constructed trough trial and error.
These trials need much time but new apparatus will cut it down.
Already at the first steps on this way we have the wonderful things (approved by experiments).
It is the new brave world where you find yourself.
A consize description of new physics.
There is an marksist dictum
that all students in Russia had known by heart:
“Matter is an objective reality that is given to our perception.”
(do not look for any meaning, it is a pure ideology).
Russian poet Huberman “united science and religion”(his own words}
by a small change of this dictum:
“Matter is an objective reality that is given by God to our perception.”
People assume this change as a joke
but actually Huberman (and not Marx) is absolutely correct.
But what is the meaning of Huberman’s dictum for physicists ?
Where is God in physics ?
And also:
Where is life in physics ?
Where is in physics the last meaning ?
In this book you will find the description
of experimental procedures
that give answers to these questions
(see Annotation and Consize Description at the end of the book).
Physics is derived as some norms of natural spirits
regulated by angels,
obeying the command of God,
acting along the last meaning of the world.
This hierarchy is revealed in local cosmologies
generating
new physics,
art (old and new),
religion (old and new),
mysticism (old and new).
This construction turns out
to have a great explanatory power
(and we have new powerful science),
to enhance the versatile life of emotions
(and we have truly creative new art),
to put on dialogue with God
(and we have a religion in divine terms),
to translate all above realms in the terms of mysticism
(and we have last all-embracing mysticism).
Those advances are the result of the establishing
of new relations between ideals of any realm
and the practice of this realm.
These relations are derived in four steps:
1. For any ideal we take an opposing ideal
and construct a covering over this opposition.
2. These contradictory ideals we put on the level
where carriers of these ideals are multiple.
3. Through different kinds of symmetry breaking
these beings generate different types of dynamics
(as example, dynamics of matter, dynamics of soul, dynamics of spirit).
4. These different types of dynamics are related
through common initial beings.
The concrete form of this relation
is determined by the demands of
self-concordance
and self-supportance
for all this construction..
This procedure transforms the today’s dynamics of any realm to a new dynamics:
new science, new art, new religion, new mysticism
– they are a results of the above mentioned symmetry breaking.
This procedure must be repeated for the whole number of ideals to have
last science, last art, last religion, last mysticism.
The most interesting thing: these four last realms turn out to be identical.
Here we have many new practices
and as one of them we have the ship for absolute flight.
The described task I start from physics
because the power of matter is now the main hindrance
in realization of artistic, religious, mystical aspirations.
Physics was designed by the world program
not only to understand the dynamics of matter
but mainly to overcome the power of matter
The apparatus and procedures that ensure
the victory of mind over matter will be described in this book
Introduction. Two great errors of today’s physics are rectified.
It is assumed now
that evolution of physics is near to its end
because today’s theory explain
practically all today’s experiments.
Actually our time is the time of the beginning of physics.
This new era started from the redemption
of two dead sins of the past physics:
1. Only the dynamics of one world was discussed.
2. Only the language of mathematics was used.
In this Introduction I shall try to describe in the most concise form
the way out of two above limitations.
The starting point was the long-standing problem
of two signs of time in the basic equations of physics.
It means that these equations
admit solutions that differ in the sign of time.
I.e. according to equations
we must have waves and particles
that can go as from the past so from the future.
But in our everyday experience
we have waves and particles
that go only from the past.
It means that something very important
is absent in our knowledge about time.
In statistical physics we have an analogous problem:
In our environment all processes
are attended with the growth of chaos.
Or, in other terms,
any particle under the influence of some chaotic forces
retains some knowledge about its past
but do not know its future.
But we can imagine the inverse situation
where particles strive to a known detector in the future.
These particles I name anti-causal.
These two kind of dynamics of ensembles of particles:
causal,
anti-causal
are equally acceptable as solutions of the basic equations of physics.
But we see in our environment
a definite arrow of causality.
It means that something very important
is absent in our knowledge of causality.
These two problems was the objects
of the long and intense discussions
by the creators of physics.
The most interesting solution
for the problem of two signs of time
was put forward in 1945 by Wheeler and Feynman [1].
They proposed to take as solutions of Maxwell equations
not only the waves from the past (retarded)
A(ret) (1)
and not only the waves from the future (advanced)
A(adv) (2)
but their half-sum
A(initial) = 1/2 [A(ret) + A(adv)] (3)
This choice seems to contradict
our everyday experience
but actually it is not the case
With the above rule we have loops in time:
The retarded wave radiated by an electron
can go to the distant electrons of the universe
and after scattering on these electrons
can return as advanced wave (see Fig.1).
This returning wave can be calculated
and turns out to be
A(scatt) = 1/2 [A(ret) - A(adv)] (4)
In experiments we see the sum
A = A(initial) + A(scatt)
that is (according to (1) and (2)) equal to usual retarded solution
A = A(ret) (5)
We see here an interesting phenomenon:
We start from the rule (3) that is different to the usual rule (1).
But after using the rule (3) we discover in any act of dynamics
the response from the distant matter of the universe
(this response is absent if we use usual rule (1)).
As result, it turns out that on observable level
the consequences of rule (3) are the same as of rule (1).
That is for two signs of time
but for two signs of causality
the analogous procedure does not work.
Because of this I put forward a new procedure
of time-symmetrization that have two new features:
1. It is the symmetrization in relation to
two signs of time,
two signs of causality,
two these oppositions.
2. It is the symmetrization of the worlds
and not the symmetrization of solutions.
The output turns out to be completely unexpectable:
Beside the usual classical electrodynamics
as input we have classical electrodynamics
with two signs of time and two signs of causality
for zero mass electrons
and as output beside usual classical electrodynamics
(with one sign of time - only retarded solutions)
we have also
the mass of electron,
quantum mechanics,
gravitation
with correct values of physical constants.
but only for usual experimental situations.
Here we have also many new effects
though as input I had taken
the usual classical Maxwell electrodynamics
with zero mass electrons.
All new effects are the result
of the response from the universe.
We see here an interesting phenomena:
In any act of radiation
all universe is taking a part
and completely change
the rule of choosing the right solution.
But if the role of universe is so important
why we assume
before the universe is taken into account
the same Maxwell equations as
after the universe is taken into account ?.
The same question we have for the basic notions:
time, coordinates, field.
All these notion can be changed
by the response fro the universe.
But in the new procedure of time-symmetrization
this question turns out to be unexpectedly unswered.
This answer become possible because
with the new procedure of time-symmetrization
I have discovered a new phenomena:
local cosmologies.
This new phenomena is not something exotic,
we meet local cosmology on every our step.
The advanced time-symmetrization
predict local cosmologies
but do not form here the complete theory.
The cause of this imperfection is evident:
the choise of Maxwell equations as the input was arbiterary!
Then we can take Maxwell equations
with some additional unknown X
and can see the consequences.
It turns out that for X
decreasing with the distance rapidly than 1/r
the dynamics in usual experimental situations
turns out to be the same as without X.
In this case the cotribution of X to local dynamics is zero
because the local dynamics is formed
by the response from the distant matter.
Hence the usual physics
that is formed by this response
does no depend on X.
But the dynamics of local cosmologies depend on X !
Hence we can take X
from the well known dynamics of local cosmologies.
It turns out that precisely this dynamics
is studed by our art, religion, mysticism.
According to the above section
the dynamics of any of these realms
can be extended and
the relations between realms
can be calculated
using the conditions of self-supportance.
As result, we would have
new art,
new religion,
new mysticism
where many today’s problem are solved.
Now we know the relations
of those realms to physics
and can exert control on these relations.
This mean the liberation of
soul,
spirit,
last senses
from unconscious power of matter.
All that is interesting and useful
for practitioners of these realms
because now we can go out
of today’s vicous cercles
in any realm of science or culture.
We have for these dead end cercles
the general plan of the world.
We can see through this plan
the relation of our unfortunate cercle
to
the one unique cercle of the infinite way.
Now we know
the dependence of physics on othere realms of culture
and can consciously change physics
together with these realms.
Then now
laws of physics,
soul,
spirit,
last senses
taken together
can putting on infinite way.
Hence we can set off for absolute flight.
For problems of physics all that is important
because it give us the full description
of dynamics of local cosmologies.
With this dynamics we can reconstruct
the dynamics before the Big Bang.
In this way we can translate this knowledge
(and this different languages)
in physics.
This will be done in the next chapters.
The special technique of this translation will be described.
As result, we would have the unique determination
of physics by art,
of art by religion,
of religion by mysticism.
This determination is greatly facilitated
by the using the notions of
natural spirits,
angels,
Names
that we already have in our culture.
Different levels of physics
are the collective norms of those beings.
As result,
physics will have “the tailes” of art,
art will have “the tailes” of religion,
religion will have “the tailes” of mysticism.
This tailes are practically absent
in today’s experimental settings.
But in local cosmologies
physics can through this tailes
return to mysticism.
This returning is identical
to the theory of absolute flight.
But for the real flight
we can unite two pictures of the world:
objective,
subjective
and from this unity to derive
the construction of the ship for the absolute flight.
Below I shall start
from a simple trial physical dynamics
but shall have in mind the arbiterary character of this choise.
Then I shall through the local cosmologies
systematically reveal the higher realms of culture
that actually are the part of initial dynamics.
Here with any new realm
we would have
an additional level in dynamics of symmetry breakings,
an additional level in the general plan of the world.
along with the more detailed description
of the internal dynamics of any realm.
At the end of this path
we would have science and culture
that are clousing on itself
and can generate new complete worlds.
But all these procedures turn out
to be very complex.
This unusual complexity
we find out yet in the simplest case
of the Maxwell equation as input.
I can write down the basic equations
(or their analogues in art, religion, mysticism)
but can solve them only through simple trials.
That is the cause of a great amount of time
that was taken even by the simplest cases.
This selection of solutions is in some aspects analogious
to the natural selection that we have in evolution and in history.
But the intervals of time in the natural selection
are tremendously greater.
Hence with the selection in a models
the rate of evolution increase tremendously.
Because of this complexity
I shall start not from a stating the whole problem
but from an example of a simple physical dynamics:
zero mass electrons interacting
through classical electrodynamics.
Here we have the problem
of taking into account
two signs of time
and two signs of causality.
In the course of solving this problem
you will find out new notions
that are needed for discussing the whole problem.
Myth of myths.
After taking as initial dynamics the hierarchy:
initial physics,
natural spirits,
angels,
God
and after the calculation of interaction of four initial worlds
we would have a symmetry breaking
that generate four new worlds.
On the level of pure physics
these four resulting worlds do not interact.
But after taking into account the natural spirits
these four worlds turn out to be interacting
and generate as result of new symmetry breaking
another four worlds that differ
in the kinds of opposing natural spirits.
These four worlds interact on the level
of four opposing kinds of angels
and generate the last tetrade on the four image of God.
If natural spirits, angels, God are described
by an objective unemotional language
we would have from above procedure
a four-level myth of new physics.
If natural spirits, angels, God are described
by an artistic language
we would have an artistic myth
where norms of spirits would be near to laws of physics.
From a religious description
of natural spirits, angels, God
we would have a religious myth
with three-level description of physics
(these levels differ in language).
Froma the description
of natural spirits, angels, God in mystical terms
we would have a mystical picture of our world as a whole
with four-level description of physics
(these levels differ in language).
In this general scheme we can take
different kinds of natural spirits,
different kinds of angels,
different images of God
from different traditions.
Because of this I speak about Myth of myths.
It is a simplifyed description.
Actually we have at any level
a number of symmetry breaking
with different parameters of symmetry breaking.
These more complex picture arose
because at the level of initial dynamics
(an image of God’s will)
we have a wholwness.
The parametes of symmetry breaking
at any level also form a whole.
These four types of wholeness
are constructed according to many examples
that we have in evolution and history.
This general scheme we have in our mind
but the end result of all this symmetry breaking
will be the description of a world
that is party identical
to our today’s world of matter and culture.
With the help of these identityes
we can translate the initial hierarchy
in our today’s language
Hence the results of symmetry breaking
(new apparatus, procedures, languages)
also will be translated in today’s language.
Hence we can simply arrange needed constructions
according to the above discriptions.
Among these constructions
we have the ship for absolute flight..
General description of my derivation of physics.
I start from the well known fact:
the basic equations of physics
are symmetric in two signs of time.
It is the symmetry of past and future.
In an abstract chaotic system
(and not in observed situations)
we have another symmetry:
the degree of chaos can increase or decrease.
It is the symmetry of causal and anticausal processes.
There is also the symmetry
between these two pairs of oppositions.
All those types of solutions
we must take into account
calculating the ground state of the universe
or solving some other problems.
But in general case we would have here
loops in time and in causality
that generate a collaps of the universe as a whole.
In order to avoid this collaps we must take solutions
with the same signs of time
and the same signs of causality.
Then we would have four different worlds.
But our world is only one of them.
Where are these three other worlds ?
My answer: all four worlds are sticking together
in a symmetric combination.
But why in our everyday experience
we do not see this symmetry ?
My answer: our universe is a system
of many such symmetric combinations.
As a result of interaction of this symmetric combinations
we have four types of symmetry breaking.
One of these symmetry breaking is our world.
But there are three other with different arrows of time and causality.
Hence we have two tetrades:
four initial (input) worlds,
four final (output) worlds.
On the level of physics four final worlds are identical.
But let us take the whole dynamics of initial worlds
with their apparatuses, observers, languages and so on.
These apparatus and so on are described from our point of view
and because of this the symmetry of four worlds is broken.
Now after taking into account
the response from the universe
we would have four different worlds
that turns out to be identical to the realm of:
science,
art,
religion,
mysticism.
In the same manner we must take into account
not only the response from
the universe
but also the respnse from psyche,
society,
world as a whole.
At any of these steps we would have
some advanced forms of
science,
art,
religion,
mysticism.
Here we would have a great number of local cosmologies.
Any natural system is one of those cosmologies (see Ch.2)
One of those cosmologies must be identical to our society (it is a natural system).
This identity can be understood in two ways:
freedom of our will is an illusion,
the whole world is generated by our will.
After sticking together these opposing world views
we would have the correct physics.
It is a general description of the long and complex story.
Now I shall describe the beginning of this story in more details.
I start from the well known fact
of four kinds of solutions to basic equations of physics.
Waves or particles can go from the past and from the future
and the cause of their movement may be placed
at the beginning or at the end of a path.
It is the general case
though usually physicists are speaking
about two signs of time (in the absence of chaos)
and about the increasing or decreasing entropy (here we have two signs of causality)
in the absence of external forces.
Actually the tight connection of these two oppositions
generate all our physics.
In order to exclude the well known paradoxies
I suppose that these four
Higher meaning of Ch.1.
The interaction of four initial worlds
with different signs of time and causality
is calculated from conditions of
self-supportness and
self-concordance.
As a result, we have as a local extremum of action
a unique interaction between worlds.
All our physics is a consequence of this interaction.
The whole new physics (apparatus, language and so on)
will be the result of the next concretization
(here other realms of culture are needed)
of the dynamics of the four initial worlds.
But what is the meaning of mentioned above local extremum of action ?
Here we have the maximum of interaction
of the four initial worlds.
Owing to this interaction
four arrows of time and causality
was generated together and
will be cancelled together.
This picture and the principle of coincidence of oppositions
that is used in the derivation of interaction between worlds
are elements of mysticism discussed in the Ch.8.
After this approvel of interaction between worlds
I am going to calculation of this interaction.
I suppose that four worlds have a common space-time.
I asssume this space-time to be identical
to our usual space-time.
Later on I shall describe more advanced and more complex procedure
without this preposition but it is better to start from something simple.
The four worlds have identical lagrangians in the terms of field:
But have different rules for choosing the solutions.
After integration over field we would have for N electrons
four different lagrangians:
Here G is electromagnetic Green function in the world k.
In four worlds we have four conditions for extremum of E (E - energy):
minE in
retarded causal world 
minE in retarded anticausal world (6)
maxE in advanced anticausal world
maxE in advanced causal world.
See Fig.1.
If we have a number of solutions,
we can introduce the distribution f of solutions,
the kinetic equations for f (different for causal and anticausal worlds),
the entropy S of these distributions.
In four worlds we have four conditions for extremum of S:
maxS in
retarded causal world, 
minS in retarded anticausal world, (7)
minS in advanced anticausal world,
maxS in advanced
causal world.
See Fig.1.
We can take a common lagrangian for these four worlds
|
|
Now I supply any world with a number k.
(8)
Lagrangians (8) and (10) where written on the background of Minkovsky metrics.
This assumption can be weakened and we can rewrite (8) and (10) in an arbitrary metrics
Let
k = 1 for retarded causal world,
k = 2 for retarded anticausal world,
k = 3 for advanced anticausal world,
k = 4 for advanced causal world.
The lagrangian for the whole system of four worlds
(9)
I assume to be the sum of lagrangians of these worlds:
Here equation for A and for x do not depend on k
but rules of choosing the correct solution are different for different k
Conditions for extreme (6-7) for a variable also depend on
the kind of world (from above four kinds)
that contain this variable.
I assume for electrons the possibility to pass
from one world to another with a constant probability.
I assume that for any of such transitions
the sign of time and the sign of causality are changed simultaneously.
I.e. probability is nonzero for transitions:
from retarded causal world to advanced anticausal (and vice verse),
from retarded anticausal world to advanced causal (and vice verse).
See Fig.2.
Hence a particle that is going forward in time
can pass to advanced world and go backward.
Then this particle can return to retarded world and so on.
As a result we would have at any time not a one electron
but a number of transitions of the same electron.
Let the density of this transitions in the world k is
According to the above mentioned rule for transitions from one world to another we have for two relations:
(7)
After putting these distributions in (6) we have:
(8)
Now the most important step:
I suppose an interaction between four worlds.
This presupposition seems meaningless
because nobody nowhere have seen different physical worlds.
Hence we can not say anything about this interaction.
But actually these considerations turns out to be unimportant
because
there is one unique interaction that ensure stability of this system.
I am going to calculate this interaction.
In order to simplify calculations
I assume:
1. Interaction exist only for two worlds
that differ in the sign of time of in the sign of causality.
Hence
: retarded causal density interact with retarded anticausal density,
retarded anticausal density interact with advanced anticausal density,
advanced anticausal density interact with advanced causal density,
advanced causal density interact with retarded causal density,
See Fig.3.
.
2. All these interactions are described by the same function
U(x-y) (9)
I.e. I consider all four worlds on equal footing.
It is a new symmetry beside the symmetry of two signs of time
and the symmetry of two signs of causality.
2.
In contradistinction to usual interaction between different electron
I suppose that interaction between different worlds
Is a self-interaction or interaction of a trajectory with itself.
It is an analogue of self-awareness.
(10)
To take into account interaction (9) we must add to (8) (interaction is proportional to density):
All that is for one electron but actually
we have in our world N electrons where
Then we have two kinds of interaction:
1.Interaction between different electrons in any world
2. Interaction between different worlds inside any electron.
We can not follow all N particles of the universe and because of this I introd
