|
|
The output of the physics of unity
turns out to be completely inexpectable:
Beside the usual classical electrodynamics
as input we have classical electrodynamics
with two signs of time and two signs of causality
for zero mass electrons
and as output beside usual classical electrodynamics
(with one sign of time - only retarded solutions)
we have also
the mass of electron,
quantum mechanics,
gravitation
with correct values of physical constants.
but only for usual experimental situations.
Here we have also many new effects
though as input I had taken
the usual classical Maxwell electrodynamics
with zero mass electrons.
All new effects are the result
of the response from the universe.
We see here an interesting phenomena:
In any act of radiation
all universe is taking a part
and completely change
the rule of choosing the right solution.
But if the role of universe is so important
why we assume
before the universe is taken into account
the same Maxwell equations as
after the universe is taken into account ?.
The same question we have for the basic notions:
time, coordinates, field.
All these notion can be changed
by the response from the universe.
But in the new procedure of time-symmetrization
this question turns out to be unexpectedly answered.
This answer become possible because
with the new procedure of time-symmetrization
I have discovered a new phenomena:
local cosmologies.
In today’s physics any local arrangement can not change cosmology
but in completely time-symmetric physics
we have for a region under local contraction or pumping
some new effects that I name local cosmology.
This new phenomena is not something exotic,
we meet local cosmology on every our step.
We have local cosmology in any leave of grass, any butterfly, any star, any galaxy.
Those local cosmologies we had seen in laboratory experiments.
The advanced time-symmetrization
predict local cosmologies
but do not form the complete theory.
The cause of this imperfection is evident:
the choice of Maxwell equations as the input was arbitrary!
This input, this correct initial physics I name heavenly physics.
We can not restore
We have no apparatus on this level
2.6 The appearance of the heavenly physics.
There is an evident defect of all above discussion:
If the response from the universe can change the rule for correct solution,
the equation itself also can be changed by this response!
Hence if you decided to take into account the response from the universe,
you find yourself not knowing the dynamics to use in this calculation.
The response from the universe is the result of time-symmetrization.
The needed here initial dynamics I name heavenly dynamics
because it exist before the creation of the universe
and is above all may be arrows of time and causality.
The notion of heavenly dynamics is very important
because now we have two dynamics:
heavenly (directly unobservable) and
mundane (usual, directly observable).
In order to get the heavenly dynamics we must:
1. Point in usual physics some supposed heavenly parts.
2. Suppose a form of unity for those parts.
3. Look in dynamics of these unity for may be collective norms.
4. Identify these collective norms as mundane physics.
The main notion here is UNITY that separate heavenly level from mundane.
This construction gives us an unusual freedom:
A WIDE CLASS OF HEAVENLY DYNAMICS GENERATE ONE MUNDANE PHYSICS.
I, e. we have here an unexpected multiplicity.
Now I can answer the ancient question: “Where are in physics
life?
Consciousness?
God?”
The answer: In above multiplicity.
You may ask: “What is the proof?”
The answer: This multiplicity can be seen in natural systems
and in the best known natural system – ourselves.
Our life, our thoughts, our image of God are manifestations of this multiplicity.
We can assume a concrete form of this multiplicity
and prove it through the picture of natural and cultural evolution.
You may object: “Physics study the dynamics of structures
but life, consciousness, image of God are in the first place
the living emotions,
the religious emotions,
the mystical emotions”
My answer: Yes, but why not take a dynamics of emotions instead of dynamics of structures?
.
You may ask: “What it means “to take a dynamics of emotions”?”
My answer: As an example you can take a number of actors
moved only by their emotions
and put before them a problem
that can be solved only through generation of new collective norms.
We can take such a problem and can take actors with such a psyche
that collective norms turn out to be identical in some cases to our today’s physics.
Then what?
Then we have in this model the relation of actor’s emotions to physics.
Emotions create physics and in some cases can influence it today..
This situation can be taken as a model of the creation of our world by emotions.
The relation of actor’s emotions to their norms
can be taken as a model of relation of our mind to our brain.
The whole above construction can be proved
trough the picture of the natural and cultural evolution.
Many other questions can appear here, these questions will be answered in the main text.
Now I return to time-symmetrization.
As I point above, the heavenly (initial) equations can not be restored from today’s physics.
It is not a deficiency, it is a manifestation of the grace of God.
Because, as it was explained above, heavenly physics can be restored
from our culture, i. e. from our fairy tales, sacred texts, poetry and so on.
New physics can be derived (through heavenly physics)
from the heavenly parts of culture and can explain all mundane parts.
Having the detailed description of heavenly level we can go to this level.
It is the end of times, the end of the history of our universe,.
Any of mentioned above advances
generate an unlimited number of new apparatus and procedures
that united in a ship for the flight to other worlds.
But the above description of new physics is not the instruction for this ship,
it is only a program for deriving this instruction
from the detailed picture of natural and cultural evolution,
from new types of experiments.
The main task here is the translation
of structures, language and state of mind of heavenly physics
into the structures, language and state of mind of today’s physics and culture.
This problem I have solved only for today’s physics and for some elements of new physics.
I took some simple variants of heavenly physics
and tried to pass them trough all above conditions.
If a condition was not fulfilled, I took an advanced variant of heavenly physics and so on.
In this way some features of the heavenly physics were elucidated
and I was going to the next feature and so on.
All discussions in this book are arranged along this strategy.
The book is not ended with this text, I am going to add new parts as they will be written.
I am going to do this till the end of times (and after it) - this end is near.
Now I am going to transform the described above general strategy
into the concrete procedures.
that are the subject of time-symmetrization.
What to do?
The first thought:
Let us take a trial heavenly dynamics and after time-symmetrization
and calculating the response from the universe
let us identify the output with today’s physics.
This identification will give us the equations for heavenly dynamics.
But this logic does not work
because it turns out that a wide class of heavenly dynamics
generate the same observed physics for today’s experimental settings.
Then we can take Maxwell equations
with some additional unknown X
and can see the consequences.
It turns out that for X
decreasing with the distance rapidly than 1/r
the dynamics in usual experimental situations
turns out to be the same as without X.
In this case the contribution of X to local dynamics is zero
because the local dynamics is formed
by the response from the distant matter.
Hence the usual physics
that is formed by this response
does no depend on X.
But the dynamics of local cosmologies depend on X !
Hence we can take X
from dynamics of local cosmologies.
It turns out that we have local cosmologies in any natural system (galaxy, star, plant, animal).
Then we can take X from the observed dynamics of natural systems.
This line of thought will be described in the main text in all details
but it turns out that X (and initial time-symmetric dynamics)
can not be described in the terms of today’s physics.
Then the whole building of today’s physics is falling down.
The serious people get into a mess.
The not so serious (I, as example) turn to the more general context
mentioned at the beginning of this section.
We need the knowledge of this context if we want to derive not only law of physics
but also the apparatus and procedures of measurement,
the language of physics,
the scientific state of consciousness,
our motives in science.
We can introduce here some models
of a human being, of a society, of a world program of evolution
but the description of all this is outside of physical dynamics.
Now we have for description of these phenomena
a special language and a special state of consciousness
of art, religion, mysticism.
The mathematical modeling can be changed to playing out by some actors.
These actors must play out the deep dynamics of above three realms.
It is clear that criterion of correctness of this playing out must be taken from those realms
and not only from science.
This fact is very important
because all above discussion presupposed the scientific system of criteria.
Then if we actually want to derive the complete edifice of physics
we must follow the criteria of all realms of culture and must know the relations of criteria.
Below you will see in what way any realm of culture (with its criteria)
can generate any other realm (with its criteria).
Then we can derive physics (both old and new)
with its apparatus, languages, state of consciousness.
The new physics turns out to be outside the power of matter, outside the flow of time.
You can see the described construction to be complex.
I can add that yet any part of this construction turns out to be unusually complex.
But I must remember that we have here not only new physics
but also new art, new religion, new mysticism.
And I must remember that here not only the end result is interesting
but also any step in the direction of liberation.
All that will be described in the main text.
But here and in the next three sections I want to discuss some prehistory of all that
in order to make easy for you to enter the new eon.
I shall tell you the full story of my discoveries, it is interesting because it is syncretic
and give us some hints to the sincretic state of our future culture.
Just this sincretism ensure the success of the whole adventure.
3. Synopsis – the plan and inner logic of the text
(the logic of the working key).
The advent of God of unity.
This topic will be discussed later on
My teen tortures.
As a schoolboy I did know nothing about the life in US
but it seems that I felled the atmosphere of time.
From my parents, from school, from literature I heard opinions about the worthy way of life.
I did not ask “Why?’ but it is clear that nobody can answer this question
because any ideology can not say anything about concrete personal problems.
I can through out ideology and let my life going along my instincts but these instincts
was formed millions and billions years ago and may be without any sense now.
As example, sweet food is pleasing because sugar was a source of energy
but now we can eat only sugar – it is clear that this way of eating is dangerous.
I start to read books about biology
but here all explanations refer to the soil, chemistry and so on
and after all we have only the laws of physics.
Some correct considerations.
But it is clear that physics can not form a basis of something meaningful.
Then the suspicion: I am deceived,
the society feed me with a chuff having the name “physics”.
But why this “physics” is in accord with experiments?
The answer is evident: the experimental procedures are idiotic.
There must be other procedures
that are in accord with the general meaning of our world.
I did not knew this meaning but feel that it must be holistic and sincretic.
Then our experimental procedures also must be holistic, sincretic, God-pleasing, meaningful.
But it is known the opinion of Laplace: “I do not need this hypothesis”
(here “this” can be anything above physics).
Then Laplace agreed to live
in a schizoid world with a schizoid God (Laplace was a religious man).
I do not agree (here the influence of God of unity)
and was strenuously looked in physics for some traces of relations to other part of the world.
I composed a list of suspected features
and start to think and to read about these aspects of physics.
The most fruitful turns out to be the doubts about the today’s rule
of writing out the solutions of physical equations that are symmetric in two signs of time.
These equations admit for waves and particles solutions
that describe the moving as from the past to future so from future to past.
The solutions of the second type are thrown out as “unphysical”
because in our environment we do not see them.
But God can see both types of solutions!
Breackthrough.
The first idea: let us take a combination of both solutions
and let see all consequences of this assumption.
This line of thought was used by Wheeler and Feynman in 1945.
They had taken a new rule for writing out solutions of Maxwell equations: they assume solution to be half sum of waves from the past and waves from the future.
The result turns out to be surprising: on observable level waves from the future are cancelled.
But to ensure this cancellation all universe must be taken into account.
2. The highly unusual topic of this book (the key as a new paradigm).
Reading a book you await to find new ideas, facts, emotions.
All of them are parts of some known paradigms
because outside this paradigms you can not see anything.
But the topic of this book is a new paradigm.
Then you will find a number of interconnected new ideas, facts, emotions.
They form a new technique for solving a great number of problems.
New paradigm and new technique can no be described or explained
as can not be described the art of bicycle riding.
The meaning of the term “technique” can be elucidated with the example of physics.
The basic principles of physics and the basic equations of physics
can be written on a sheet of paper.
But to know physics you must spent 15 years of study.
To study what?
The answer: to study technique of physics.
As an example: every physicist know that the dynamics of a chair flying far above the ground
can be described as the dynamics of a point mass.
But if this chair stand on the ground we are interested in other characteristics of this chair.
The gist of physics is the art of going from concrete objects to its idealized images
and inverse act of deriving some consequences for the initial real object.
Our physics is a unity of a great number of such local techniques.
The same is true for new physics but with other local techniques and with other type of unity.
Then you must yourselves to repeat any derivation below.
And when you will try to repeat some derivations below
you must be interested not only in new ideas or facts that you can find here
but mostly in employment of these procedures in other situations interesting to you.
Most examples below are taken from physics
but the technique used here is not a special for physics.
You must yourselves try, for example, to calculate electron mass
and to see it to be equal to its experimental value (see Section 8 for such an examples).
It is an interesting example of derivation of an individual psyche from the social conditions.
You must yourselves try to construct the general plan of the universe.
In the same manner you can construct the true story of your life or a true history of a society.
These constructions will show you the fate of your life, of society, of the universe.
After these steps you would understood the text below.
In the same manner you will understood the chapters on art, religion, mysticism
only after some your original work in those realms.
A limited number of exercises of this kind you will find below,
I hope in near future to design a complete number of these exercises.
10. Something about the peculiarity of the topic
(the hard work of using the key).
Yet if you choice life and decided to study the key,
it is only the first step on the long difficult way.
Now I am going to describe three kinds of such a difficulty.
1.1 The deep knowledge of traditions is needed.
The correct image of God will be derived from heavenly parts of today’s
science,
art,
religion,
mysticism.
For heavenly part of a realm the correctness of its singling out
can be proved trough the history of this realm.
This proof is a formidable task presupposing deep knowledge of this realm.
Actually we have an intuition (or feeling) of “heavenlyness”
but this intuition can appear only as a result of a long practice.
1.3 The unity of different realms.
In the text below you can see angels next to some formulas of physics.
Here some people become nervous and ask me not mention angels.
Though other people think physics to be out to place here.
Both do not want to read such a text.
This response is the result of the serious drawbacks of today’s culture.
It is interesting that these people do not ask me: “Why angels are next to physics?”
But some readers can ask and I point the causes of this “strange nearness”.
1. You will see below that physics is identical to some angelic norms.
2. The correct physics of future (not today’s physics that is incorrect)
can not be formulated without relations to angels.
3. The usual scientific description of the history of my discoveries
can not explain its incredible effectiveness.
But the God’s pleasure from my basic hypotheses explains its effectiveness.
4. In any nontrivial experiment you must play out the angelic dynamics
in order to design the experimental setting, to carry out the measurement,
to understand the result.
1.4 The new paradigm.
Reading a book you await to find new ideas, facts, emotions.
All of them are parts of some known paradigms
because outside this paradigms you can not see anything.
But the topic of this book is a new paradigm.
Then you will find a number of interconnected new ideas, facts, emotions
that form a new technique for solving a great number of problems.
But the new paradigm itself and new technique can no be described or explained
as can not be described the art of bicycle riding.
The meaning of the term “technique” can be elucidated with the example of physics.
The basic principles of physics and the basic equations of physics
can be written on a sheet of paper.
But to know physics you must spent 15 years of study.
To study what?
The answer: To study technique of physics.
As an example: every physicist know that the dynamics of a chair flying far above the ground
can be described as the dynamics of a point mass.
But if this chair stand on the ground we are interested in other characteristics of this chair.
The gist of physics is the art of going from concrete objects to its idealized images
and inverse act of deriving some consequences for the initial real object.
Our physics is a unity of a great number of such local techniques.
The same is true for new physics but with other local techniques and with other type of unity.
Then you must yourselves to repeat any derivation below.
And when you will try to repeat some derivations below
you must be interested not only in new ideas or facts that you can find here
but mostly in employment of these procedures in other situations interesting to you.
Most examples below are taken from physics
but the technique used here is not a special for physics.
You must yourselves try, for example, to calculate electron mass
and to see it to be equal to its experimental value (see Section 8 for such an examples).
You must yourselves try to construct the general plan of the universe.
In the same manner you can construct the true story of your life or a true history of a society.
These constructions will show you the fate of your life, of society, of the universe.
After these steps you would understood the text below.
In the same manner you will understood the chapters on art, religion, mysticism
only after some your original work in those realms.
A limited number of exercises of this kind you will find below,
I hope in near future to design a complete number of these exercises.
1.5 The task of translation.
The physics below will be written out on two interconnected levels:
heavenly,
mundane.
The languages of these two levels are different.
Hence the derivation of mundane from heavenly presuppose
the translation of the heavenly language into our usual language.
This task turns out to be unusually complex.
ALL THAT IS THE PRICE FOR CHOOSING THE RIGHT WAY OF LIFE.
1.6 Plan of Introduction (and of the whole text).
I start from some natural extensions of pure physics
and demonstrate the inevitable use of art, religion, mysticism
for the construction of the complete physics.
From this advanced point of view I see the “pure physics” to be a fiction,
the actual creative process use on unconscious level art, religion, mysticism.
Not observed culture but the heaven image of this culture.
This heavenly image can be restored through the use of the history of discoveries.
Then I repeat the scientific story in the different “systems of reference”:
as a history of my feelings and motives,
as the will and action of God,
as some mystical drives.
It is important
for understanding this history,
for above mentioned proof of myths,
for the correct language and correct state of mind needed in the physics of future.
The arrangement of the main text is the same:
I start from physics (Ch.1-2) where
Ch.1 describes new physics and
Ch.2 describes new scientific myth of the universe.
Those two chapters discuss new structures.
Then I am going to art (Ch.3-4) where
Ch.3 introduce new language and
Ch.4 introduce new artistic myth of the universe.
These two chapters discuss new language.
Then I am going to religion (Ch.5-6) where
Ch.5 introduce new state of mind and
Ch.6 introduce new religious myth of the universe.
These two chapters discuss new state of conscious.
Then I am going to mysticism (Ch.7-8) where
Ch.7 is about the dynamics of the last meanings and
Ch.8 is about the system of the last meanings of the universe.
The advances in art, religion, mysticism are interesting in itself
but here they are important as the parts of the complete right physics of the future.
1. Invitation – about the topic (the key as a fulfilled dream).
2.1 We are living at the time of the greatest of all revolutions.
Now we think that we live according to the laws of physics
but below you will see
the end of the power of matter,
the beginning of the direct dialogue with God,
the first steps to the ship for absolute flight.
All that is a collective adventure because
right physics,
correct image of God
and successful absolute flight
turns out to be the result of a collective effort
of a number of human beings
that must be maximally different on the most deep level.
Then I invite you to take part in this revolution.
This revolution has many different aspects
and I hope you will find below something near to your interests.
Most people
are busy with their own problems
and see this revolution as something too general
to be related to their problems.
But this “general” is the will of God
who is the only source of fullness and meaningfulness of life.
Then you must make a choice.
But yet if you choice life, it is only the first step on the long difficult way.
Now I am going to describe three kinds of such a difficulty.
2.2 The deep knowledge of traditions is needed.
The correct image of God will be derived from heavenly parts of today’s
science,
art,
religion,
mysticism.
For heavenly part of a realm the correctness of its singling out
can be proved trough the history of this realm.
This proof is a formidable task presupposing deep knowledge of this realm.
Actually we have an intuition (or feeling) of “heavenlyness”
but this intuition can appear only as a result of a long practice.
1.3 The unity of different realms.
In the text below you can see angels next to some formulas of physics.
Here some people become nervous and ask me not mention angels.
Though other people think physics to be out to place here.
Both do not want to read such a text.
This response is the result of the serious drawbacks of today’s culture.
It is interesting that these people do not ask me: “Why angels are next to physics?”
But some readers can ask and I point the causes of this “strange nearness”.
1. You will see below that physics is identical to some angelic norms.
3. The correct physics of future (not today’s physics that is incorrect)
can not be formulated without relations to angels.
4. The usual scientific description of the history of my discoveries
can not explain its incredible effectiveness.
But the God’s pleasure from my basic hypotheses explains its effectiveness.
5. In any nontrivial experiment you must play out the angelic dynamics
in order to design the experimental setting, to carry out the measurement,
to understand the result.
1.6 The new paradigm.
Reading a book you await to find new ideas, facts, emotions.
All of them are parts of some known paradigms
because outside this paradigms you can not see anything.
But the topic of this book is a new paradigm.
Then you will find a number of interconnected new ideas, facts, emotions
that form a new technique for solving a great number of problems.
But the new paradigm itself and new technique can no be described or explained