|
|
| THE WAY Preface. ---------- By the term “way” I mean the path of evolution of our World. That is a sequence of oppositions that appear and disappear on the background of four Names: Name of beginning, Name of the end, Name of common motives, Name of common language. The Way is the process of translation of the Name of beginning to the Name of the end. The book is constructed along the same picture and the same logic. There are another Ways that are also important. This picture of evolution is sufficiently concrete to derive Names from known traditions and derive from those Names science and culture of the future. I’ll start from projection of this scheme on physics. I’ll derive all physics with many new effects but for many of those effects we must turn to more deep levels of description including some details of the Names. To know those details we must repeat in other realms of culture the same procedures as in physics. As result all realms of culture will go to their common redemption. This system of principles is the result of all my life work. Many concrete problems were solved, many keys to the Universe were tried and thrown out. The simplest way to understand me is to repeat my mental history. But some details are important only for me then below I’ll use some moments of my way to discover above system (that way is simple) so as its direct translation to today language (that translation turn out to be complex). Content. ---------- Any part has chapters: Any section of a chapter has: Part 1. The way out of time and matter (science). for curiosity-seekers, main text(logic of the plot), Part 2. The way to others (art). for truth-seekers, notes, Part 3. Walking along the way of God (religion). for adventure-seekers, appendixes, Part 4. The way to last senses (mysticism). for future’s human being. commentaries. Part 1. The way out of time and matter or the meaning of the term “science”. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Chapter 1.1 (for curiosity-seekers). An aspect of the history of science. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Section 1. From Thales to Newton – dialogue with Creator. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Usually people think they know the meaning of the term “science” and are saying something as “Science explain the structure of objective world and somewhere may be useful”. That is true but that is not the most important and the most interesting feature of science. Let us take a look on history. Thales, one of the founders of science, had proved the theorem that was the first in the history of science: diameter of any circle divide this circle in two equal parts. When he was asked: “Why prove so evident thing?”, he answered: “That is my way to speak with God”. At the end of this text I’ll explain why God is interested in mathematics (that is a means for common angelic actions) and what is the way through mathematics to God (actually through a number of different formal systems). The most advanced project of science was put forward by Hermes Trismegist around 2 century b.c. in the form of 18 keys. The first key had described basic principles of science (in today sense) and of Judaism, other 17 discussed some moral questions. You can ask: “Why to mixture different realms?” – the answer you can find at the end of the book. The next step in evolution of science (15 century, Italy) was tightly connected with mysticism. At that time Hermes Trismegist become known and become highly appreciated. Mathematics of heaven had start in works of Kepler (16 century) but that only few pages from15 volumes of mysticism that till now don’t translated in English. Section 2. From Newton till now – dialogue with Nature. ------------------------------------------------------------------- In 17 century we have the beginning of modern science mainly through Newton’s closed system of description of material world. The Newton’s inheritance form three trunks of hand written texts: one on physics, one on alchemy (actually about psychology), one on theology. In what way were they related in Newton’s mind? The answer will be evident at the end of this book. Only the first trunk enters the scientific tradition. Leibnitz have discovered differential calculus as a part of the Universal calculus. Only small part of this enter scientific tradition in the form of a book by L’hospital. Faraday as teenager had wanted to solve through physics some moral problems. Later on he thinks himself to be a philosopher but we don’t know any his philosophical saying. Many scientists had interest in philosophy (as example, Einstein and Bohr) but without any clear influence on their professional work. Then after a long numbers of simplifications (that were very productive) we have a carcass of something that before was a living body. We had lost any regulation from above – that is the price for effectiveness. Only one unscientific feature survives the aesthetic passion for symmetry. That was the way Maxwell constructs his equations. There was a problem of symmetry that had attracted a special attention: the problem of direction of the arrow of time. We can take a film and set it to move in reverse direction. We would see the world that seems to be strange – but this world doesn’t contradict any low of physics or logic. Then why we don’t see this world as in our everyday life so in laboratory? Many great scientists try to solve this problem. Dirac had made some suggestions. But Weeler and Feynman made the systematic advance in 1945. That was the state of matter when I had entered the field of physics. Section 3. From now to redemption – working together with Creator. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Now people are too busy to relate physics to something else. This positions remind me an experiment that was made by Russian psychologist Lodigina-Kotz. She suspended banana in the cell with chimpanzee. Chimpanzee can not reach banana but there was a steak on the floor of the sell. After a number of unsuccessival jumps chimpanzee takes this steak and gets the banana. Then a small boy was put in the same situation. He was jumping again and again very long time. Ladigina-Kotz was saying to him: “See around, may be you ‘ll find something interesting.” But the boy answered: “I haven’t time to see around, I must reach the banana.” And go on jumping. It will be shown below that “steak” (i.e. new physics) is near, on usual scales of space-time and energy. But as school boy I was living in Russian country where all examples mentioned above assumed to be not only unessential but also ideologically dangerous. I have some feelings of beauty and grandness of science but can say with Dostoevsky (forbidden at that time): “If I live in such a world, I return to God my ticket.” That is natural for teenager: World is constructed along the science but science don’t know anything about the meaning of the World. The science also doesn’t know anything about the human being. Then we have with science degrading feeling of helplessness before great masses of the Universe. And more concrete question: Where is the world with other direction of time-arrow? Then the feeling of deception: today physics is only outward appearance, something genuine must be behind this screen. Then I start to look for this “behind”. I had taken two signs of time for electrons in quantum mechanics and get a very simple formulation of quantum mechanics. That was my dissertation. I had taken two signs of time for electrons and waves in classical physics and derive all quantum mechanics and gravitation. Some important and interesting details: I was living in the country, on the bench of a river and was thinking on above mentioned “behind”. In all variants that prephysics turn out to be symmetric in to signs of time. How to get rid of the waves and particles that go from the future? I had remember that Wheeler and Feynman (see above section) solve this problem. I don’t have their paper and decided to calculate myself the response from the Universe, that, according to Wheeler and Feynman, cancel advanced waves. And after half-hour I get not only above cancellation but all quantum mechanics (in classical language!) and gravitation with right magnitude of all new constants, with many new effects. Is it not a revelation? Later on I’ll understand the cause of this insight. Instead of usual (in mathematics) sum of two possible solutions I unconsciously had taken two opposite (in direction of time) worlds sticking together. Then the ancient principle of coincidence of oppositions starts to work and start to generate new physics. But what is the nature of this sticking? The simplest assumption: two worlds with different arrows of time have a common metrics – is enough for all our today physics (the basic interactions also can be derived). But what is the time-symmetric system of reference? To answer this question I must derive not only equations of physics but also all “humanitarian”aspects of physics: language, perception and so on. Now I can, in principle, to do this but here instead of 30 minutes I had spent 30 years (with some important revelation). I can simply repeat above derivation for other oppositions but the most difficult question is about relations of different oppositions. Those relations are determined by Names (see Preface). The Names are determined by all traditions of science and culture through some mechanism of evolution. That mechanism is the consequence of four revelations: coincidence of oppositions, method of constructing the general plan of the World, the language of multiverse, the unity of Names at the beginning and the end of the Universe. Section 4. Science of near future - science of liberation. ------------------------------------------------------------------- With algorithm described in Section 3 we can derive lows of physics from simple ideal and demand. To derive apparatus for measurement, language, history of physics and so on we must take some additional ideals and demands. Those ideals (and demands) form a system that can be reconstructed from the kind of history I described in Sections 1-2 (as conscious or unconscious ideals of founders of science). Those ideals can be reconstructed also from the process of physical education as a sequence of oppositions. This sequence (with principles of regulation and norms of action) is identical to Name. This procedure can be repeated for other realms of culture with their own Names. The right prephysics and the right physics that enter above-mentioned algorithm have the form of a number of theories (or physical worlds) that are connected through higher realms. Different usage’s of algorithm are related and form the general plan of the World. That is the beautiful picture formed by main characteristics of natural systems. This plan was discovered accidencetly, it has many interesting consequences, and it can be extended in different directions. As the evident condition for liberation (having many projections) I put forward the Unity of Names. Those four elements (algorithm, language, plan of the World, unity of Names) are used for description of dialogue of Names. Our scientific picture of evolution and our physics are determined by conditions for existence of this dialogue. The procedures of this new science in some aspects are similar to Newton’s alchemy: Newton had set alchemical experiments in special state of mind, using special images, at special configuration of stars and so on. All that he had taken from tradition. But in new science apparatus, procedures, language, technique of meditation, state of mind, norms of society are derived (calculated, as we calculate configurations of matter in today physics, or played out) in contradistinction to ancient practices. But as in ancient practices all dynamics are syncretic through the unity of Names.  |
 |