<<TO CONTENT

 TO SINCRETIC SCIENCE OF FUTURE.
--------------------------------------------------

Abstract.

-----------

You have here a new genre because my aim is not a general description and not a general explanation but a concrete, DETAILED (ALSO GENERAL) plan of action – and then the action itself.
I’ll describe below the project of new science. This science is self-reflexive (can understand and change its own foundations) and, in principle, don’t need any experiment. The new possibilities that are open here are much greater than in today physics and are limited only by level of consciousness of observer. But for going above those limits I have some new algorithms.
That is the fourth (and the last for our World) step in evolution of our culture (the fist three: Judaism, Christianity, Science). The description of this new science has below the form of natur-philosophycal (or systemic) considerations, some revelation (new techniques with many unexpectable consequences), some surprising facts not known till now. But all that texts form a simple logical path from today science, christianity, judaism to the future’s science of redemption, of going out of time and matter.
The main algorithm of this path has four elements:
a general system,
an initial dynamics,
some ideals,
some demands.
I’ll start from the simplest form of those four elements - to demonstrate the effectiveness yet these relatively simple constructions, to illustrate underlining mechanisms. Then I’ll successively go to more deep and more high levels of description of those elements – along another algorithms and on the background of a picture that I name “The Unity of Names”. The main steps have the form of derivation of:
gravitation,
quantum mechanics,
basic interactions,
prephysical dynamics,
other realms of culture,
Unity of Names.
For those different levels we have analogous transitions to next level but different apparatus, procedures, languages. Actually only two first dynamics are derived in details, for other I can derived some general feature. Because of this I can not set now the most interesting experiments, but there are enough evidence (and may be many other proves or disproves) on more simple levels. Our today physics practically don’t contradict any experiment but is patently erroneous so on usual scales of energy and space-time. We didn’t see that because of many esthetical, religious, mystical deficiencies of our way of thinking.
Now all this material has the form of concise description (actually for myself), 300 pages in English, 2000 pages in Russian. All that hard to understand because of many points of departure from today ways of thinking. Those ways must be taken into account simultaneously – that problem can not be solved by a slogan, by an article, by a book. But the future if not for all – this we know from today picture of evolution.

Part 1.

NEW PHYSICS FROM OTHER REALMS OF CULTURE
THROUGH HIERARCHY OF SYMMETRIZATIONS.

Warning
----------

It is not a natural philosophy, it is not about physics – it is the working physics. Here all notions are defined in term of experimental procedures (and not through some unknown inherited abilities as in today physics). Actually I have done this only for some notions but I have a program for doing this for all other notions. Those new procedures may differ from usual one. Then the problems of foundation (unimportant in today working physics) are discussed here – but in all cases with very concrete practical consequences. Then any feeling of understanding (say, above title) must be suspended because at start you don’t know premise and don’t know consequences.
The problem is that not only answers but also the questions need some explanation. As example: If our physics is wrong (on usual scales), why nobody sees this? If our physics have some relation to other realms of culture, what is the language of those relations? I’ll derive physics from some intellectual feeling, but in what way something concrete and material can be generated by something faze?
You must also have in mind that my aim is not some derivations or explanations but the concrete procedures for (as example) going out of time and matter.
To understand the text below you must suspend some unconscious (tacit) assumptions of our today science:
1. If a theory rightly predict the output of experiment, then we have a right theory. Yes, but my aim is not only predictions, but also something more interesting: generation of new experimental settings.
2. We are awaiting the development of science on some vanguard line of research. But all bandwagon can go in wrong direction.
3. If we have two contradictory statements then in our world only one statement can give correct description of reality. Yes, but that is a feature of our poor language and limited state of mind – then why don’t try something new? Philosophers and mystics all times have trust in those new language and new state of mind – but till now without any connections to physics.
4. It is assumed that humanitarian foundation of science don’t have any relation to concrete problems of science. Yes, but only for today experimental setting which actually are generated by those (unconscious) foundations. If we can understand those relations we’ll open the world of unlimited possibilities.
5. Philosophy and mysticism are too fazzy to explain something concrete: place of a grain of sand or crack on the wall. Yes, but a sufficiently vast body of texts on an background of a common problem has a number of norms of interaction. Intersections of a number of different systems of norms can generate a picture with many details.
6. In mathematics we have numbers that are small without a limit and big without a limit. This assumption contradict to the picture of our World as generated by something from more higher realms of culture and as will be returning to the same realms. The optimum precision is determined by the demand to have a maximal recurring content. Any deviation from this optimum lead to destruction.
7. It is assumed that the main scientific idea can be explained to a schoolboy. But the maim idea below is the idea about a character of a concrete calculation: the calculation of the response from the Universe. Wheeler and Feynman had calculated this response in the frame of a partial time symmetrization with an astonishing result: an integral on the Universe doesn’t depend on any parameter of the Universe. But for full time symmetrization we have all local physics from this response, i. e. from this integral.
8. It is assumed now that global cosmology can determine some minor feature of local physics. But actually cosmology (and environment) determine all local physics. Through changes in near environment we can change the low of physics.

General abstract to Part 1.
----------------------------

Today physics is a result of play of general principles and experimental data.
To set us free from dependence on experiment I put forward a system of principles that must completely define not only the lows of physics but also humanitarian foundations of physics (language, mechanisms of perception, procedures of education and so on). Those principles are derived from other realms of life and culture.
Even with simplest variant of this physics we have much better description of experimental data and many new effects on usual scales energy and space-time. This approach opens the way to more powerful type of science.
After the next steps you’ll can change the low of physics.
Here we have many variants of science because here science turns out to be dependent on individuality of scientist. New physics is constructed through:
1. Derivation of physics in term of today physical language.
2. Introducing a more general language for self-contained physics.
3. Derivation of this more general physics.
4. Derivation of apparatus and states of mind for going out of time and matter.
Actually only the first point is completed in all details.
Now what we have instead of our trust in experiment?
We have a number of revelations, i.e. some simple ideals having great number of different consequences.
Those consequences explain details of our environment and details of apparatus of physics of the future.
Different senses (or meanings) of our life are united the last overwhelming, sense.

Introducton.
---------------

New science appear as results of four revelations:
1. General algorithm of constructing relations between different levels of description of some dynamics. That is the described above algorithm.
2. General plan of different levels of existence. Here for every natural system I take two most important parameters and put them on a list of paper. A beautiful picture arose.
3. The scheme of the first and the last world. That is the first and the last Unity of Names.
4. Language that describe relations between different levels. That is a mystical technique of constructing some analogs of covering and symmetry bricking.
All those vast topics are described in my book ‘The Way” (in Russian).
From these revelations follow the scheme of construction of new physics:
1. The hierarchy of steps from a partial algorithm to a complete one. Here we need syncretic language mentioned above that can be constructed with the help of the same algorithm..
2. With this complete algorithm, general plan of the world, scheme of the first and last world (all those notions are mentioned above) we can have the description of dynamic (that is an initial dynamics for algorithm) of any level we are interested (in language of this level).
3. Then with the same algorithm we are going from the internal system of reference (and language) of this level to our today language and system of reference. Actually it is a very hard problem. In that way we derive today knowledge with many new facts, see new possibilities and explore them.
4. Usually it turns out that our problems are connected with different realms of culture (different realms of culture are related through all above revelations) then we must repeat 1-3 for any of these realms.
All that cannot be understand without examples. Only one example I have worked out in details: derivation of new physics. This derivation will be described below.
The new type of science instead of usual scientific:
Principles (philosophy, methodology),
Lows of nature,
Observability demands.
We have as elementary structure:
Initial dynamics,
Principles (ideals) for this dynamics,
Closing of this dynamics on itself through some global
structure,
Symmetry breaking as results of this closing,
Resulting dynamics of parameters of this symmetry breaking,
Observability demands for resulting dynamics.
Now any lofty ideal for initial dynamics may coexist with any boring
reality on the observable level because we have now dynamics of two different
levels. The unknown initial dynamics is determined by the condition of coexistence
of those two dynamics.
Examples of principles: hierarchy of (+t, -t) symmetrizations:
Boltzman symmetrization (two unconnected worlds).
Wheeler-Feynman symmetrization (only for waves).
My symmetrization (for waves and particles but not
for metrics).
Symmetrization also for metrics but with common
angels behind.
Symmetrization for different type of angels with
common problem behind.
Symmetrization for different type of problems
inside a common Name.
Restoration of the unity of Names.
Examples of demands:
Stability for particles.
Stability for particles + stability for observer.
Stability for particles and observer + fullness of life.
Stability for particles and observer + fullness and
meaningfulness of life.
Procedures for regulation of some global structures.
Flight to other Worlds.
Examples of global structures:
Universe, human being, society, unity of Names.
Those hierarchy arose as steps in more detailed description of time-symmetric observer.
Then by repeating above simple algorithm we are going along the
stright way from our today pitiful existence to the boldest dreams of all times. We have here two-ways relations of any two levels and because of that we can start from any dream and systematically restore its material World. Be don’t afraid “angels” and other humanitarian notion – science didn’t work without them, they have strict scientific meaning (besides usual religious or artistic meaning).
Different variants of the basic algorithm are parts of global structure
(or picture) that I name" unity of Names". Here “Name” is a mystical term
that have the meaning of a generalization of name of a person, God’s name,
program of evolution, program of development, a moving force. This unity
of Names is a result of dialogues between the Names and has many different
projections on different parts of our World. In that picture our World is
at any time a message from one God-like being to another (with different
languages and different systems of values). All above principles and
demands are needed for translation of one language (and system of values)
to another. This picture explain many different features of our life and
cultural traditions. Through derivation of different ancient traditions we get
the means to understand them.
Physics also have a place in that picture: it turns out to be
identical to norms of actions of angels. The picture of angelic life with all
religious connotations but now also with all physical lows follow from unity
of Names. Those angels are needed for translation then we have a unique
optimal (but different for different observer) form of physics.
Because my trust in above revelation follow from its consequences
for higher realms of culture, actually I derive physics from those realms of
culture. The mechanisms that are working here are non-trivial and I start my
expositions from explanation of those mechanisms on two simple examples:
1. Classical electrodynamics and mechanics with two signs of time.
Actually it is something far above usual classical mechanics.
2. The picture of angels that are symmetric in relation to matter and spirit.
I don't assume that we have here something fundamental, but
actually those "naive" images follow from dialogue of Names.
Then I have divided my book (and this introduction) on four parts:
1. Derivation of quantum mechanics and general relativity (with new effects
that can be calculated in situations that are near to usual situations).
2. Individual play and collective norms of angels (that is the physics with
its humanitarian aspects).
3. Calculation of above structure from its closing on human being and society.
4. Cooperation with angels (new effects without any today limits).
As result we have the following algorithm of construction of new physics:
1. We write down ideals for initial dynamics (aesthetic, philosophical,
mystical principles).
2. We write down observability demands (conditions for life and consciousness).
3. Those two sets of demands are connected through closing on a global structure.
4. The condition of existence of this closing give us equations for initial dynamics.
5. Solving those equations we find out as initial so observable dynamics.
6. New observable dynamics give us new apparatus and procedures.
7. In that way we can construct not only lows of physics but also its language.
8. It turns out to be a new language that is above different realms of culture.
9. Then new physics generate not only today physics but also other realms of culture.
Ideals and demands are contradictory but are connected through global structures.
That is a stringent condition on initial dynamics. Taking ideals, demands, structures
from traditions and putting them in above algorithm we would have a unique initial
dynamics for deriving observable (our) new physics.
This derivation has four steps. Every step take into account one of above four global
structures (or Names). Every step has its own revelation and its own meaning of life.
Through derived physics (that is identical to norms of Names dialogue) four Names
take part in dialogue that end in last (now unknown) meaning.
As pre-requisite for all that we need here new language and new state of mind. They
are constructed (by procedure of symmetrization that is analogous to time-symmetrization)
from languages and states of mind of different realms of life and culture.
Those languages and states are related through procedures that are analogous to
symmetry breaking and to coverings (procedures of constructing the generators). Ideals
and demands unite all levels of initial dynamics in a unique structure depending on the
observer. It is the science (theory, experiment, experience) not only for matter but also for
humanitarian aspects of physics.
New languages and new states of mind can be playing out by a group of actors or by one person with some means for collectivization his acts. Here we need high level of introspection that must be spontaneous. That is the form of future’s science.
Here the language of science and the language, say, of art generate each other. From the point of view of art, science is a means to minimize the expense on translation in dialogue of Names. From scientific point of view, art is a means to regulate the dynamics of a set of different way of action. Below I’ll describe the syncretic language for this situation and algorithm of deriving the relations between different realms of culture.
With described above algorithm physics will be derived in four steps by repeating this algorithm on every step.
On every step we have a kind of revelation because on every step a simple consideration generate a great number of different consequences. Those detailed consequences generate wonderful new possibilities.
Every step has its own:
ideals (the last heavenly meaning)
demands (the last meaning from human point of view)
living force (for me).
The first step – “the general theory of everything in term of today physics” – illustrate the general mechanism of generation of physics.
The second step – “the right language of physics” –describe the dependence of physics on our psyche.
The third step – “the right state of mind” – ensure the meaningfulness of all endeavor
The fours step – “the last meaning of the World” – point out procedures for going out of time and matter.
All features of steps 1-3 follows from this last meaning but to explain mechanisms that are working here I start from the simplest first step.
As result I have algorithm of construction for any part of our physics some more general (but unique) theory that after returning to initial level predict new situations where we have new effects and new possibilities. Here we have complex problem of translation from higher system of reference (with higher humanitarian aspects or foundations) to our usual apparatus. I put here some simplifying assumptions and get all our physics – but without this assumptions the procedure must be repeated and as results of this linguistic expansion we would have dynamics that in many aspects turn out to be similar to art, religion, mysticism.
The equations (or conditions) for higher level dynamics (and its language!) turn out to be unusually complex. Then I put forward some intuitively appealing solutions
and pass them through equations. Actually that is the way of natural and cultural evolution. Then all modern and ancient traditions give us many valuable suggestions.
These constructions of solutions make the content of the text below. Only at the beginning I’ll spent some time on explaining my basic revelations.


Step 1. New physics in terms of today physical language.
----------------------------------------------------------

Physical abstract.
----------------------

Below you’ll find new rules for solving equations of classical physics that are
symmetric in two signs of time. Two symmetric halves of those rules are tightly
connected - that is a new demand on physics. This demand generate many
features of our physics (as example, all quantum mechanics) and after
taking into account this demand for other oppositions we would have
all physics without using any experimental data. Lows and procedures
of physics follow from principles and structures of above-mentioned
connections.
I'll start from classical physics because it is well known,
but I don't think it to be something basic and after explaining the
mechanisms that are working here I'll start from something more meaningful.
The questions that will be answered:
What is the using of time-symmetry in physics?
It is a means to derive all our physics.
What is the using of time-symmetry in our practice?
In time-symmetric physics we have many new effects - in particular, the
possibility of going out of time and matter.
What is time-symmetric system of reference?
The restoration of time-symmetric World is a complex problem that
need to reveal the relation of physics to other realms of life and culture.
What is the higher meaning of time-symmetry?
We are bother with stability and fight for existence but the destination
of our Universe is to go from Nothing and to return to Nothing. That is passable
only through perfect time-symmetry.

Preface.
---------

Today physics is a result of play of general principles and experimental data.
To set us free from dependence on experiment I put forward a system of principles that completely define not only the lows of physics but also humanitarian foundations of physics (language, mechanisms of perception, procedures of education and so on). Those principles are derived from other realms of life and culture.
Even with simplest variant of this physics we have much better description of experimental data and many new effects on usual scales energy and space-time. This approach opens the way to more powerful type of science.
After the next steps you’ll have any physics you want.
Here we have many variants of science because here science turns out to be dependent on individuality of scientist. New physics is constructed through:
1. Derivation of physics in term of today physical language.
2. Constructing of self-contained physics by introducing a more general language.
3. Derivation of this more general physics.
4. Derivation of apparatus and states of mind for going out of time and matter.
Now what we have instead of our trust in experiment?
We have a number of revelations, i.e. some simple ideals having great number of different consequences.
Those consequences explain details of our environment and details of apparatus of physics of the future.
Different senses (or meanings) of our life are united the last overwhelming, sense.

General introduction.
-------------------------
The new type of science instead of usual scientific:
Principles (philosophy, methodology),
Lows of nature,
Observability demands.
We have as elementary structure:
Initial dynamics,
Principles (ideals) for this dynamics,
Closing of this dynamics on itself through some global
structure,
Symmetry breaking as results of this closing,
Resulting dynamics of parameters of this symmetry breaking,
Observability demands for resulting dynamics.
Now any lofty ideal for initial dynamics may coexist with any boring
reality on the observable level because we have now dynamics of two different
levels. The unknown initial dynamics is determined by the condition of coexistence
of those two dynamics.
Examples of principles: hierarchy of (+t, -t) symmetrizations:
Boltzman symmetrization (two unconnected worlds).
Wheeler-Feynman symmetrization (only for waves).
My symmetrization (for waves and particles but not
for metrics).
Symmetrization also for metrics but with common
angels behind.
Symmetrization for different type of angels with
common problem behind.
Symmetrization for different type of problems
inside a common Name.
Restoration of the unity of Names.
Examples of demands:
Stability for particles.
Stability for particles + stability for observer.
Stability for particles and observer + fullness of life.
Stability for particles and observer + fullness and
meaningfulness of life.
Procedures for regulation of some global structures.
Flight to other Worlds.
Examples of global structures:
Universe, human being, society, unity of Names.
Then by repeating above simple algorithm we are going along the
stright way from our today pitiful existence to the boldest dreams of all times. We have here two-ways relations of any two levels and because of that we can start from any dream and systematically restore its material World. Be don’t afraid “angels” and other humanitarian notion – science didn’t work without them, they have strict scientific meaning (besides usual religious or artistic meaning).
Different variants of the basic algorithm are parts of global structure
(or picture) that I name" unity of Names". Here “Name” is a mystical term
that have the meaning of a generalization of name of a person, God’s name,
program of evolution, program of development, a moving force. This unity
of Names is a result of dialogues between the Names and has many different
projections on different parts of our World. In that picture our World is
at any time a message from one God-like being to another (with different
languages and different systems of values). All above principles and
demands are needed for translation of one language (and system of values)
to another. This picture explain many different features of our life and
cultural traditions. Through derivation of different ancient traditions we get
the means to understand them.
Physics also have a place in that picture: it turns out to be
identical to norms of actions of angels. The picture of angelic life with all
religious connotations but now also with all physical lows follow from unity
of Names. Those angels are needed for translation then we have a unique
optimal (but different for different observer) form of physics.
Because my trust in above revelation follow from its consequences
for higher realms of culture, actually I derive physics from those realms of
culture. The mechanisms that are working here are non-trivial and I start my
expositions from explanation of those mechanisms on two simple examples:
2. Classical electrodynamics and mechanics with two signs of time.
Actually it is something far above usual classical mechanics.
2. The picture of angels that are symmetric in relation to matter and spirit.
I don't assume that we have here something fundamental, but
actually those "naive" images follow from dialogue of Names.
Then I have divided my book (and this introduction) on four parts:
1. Derivation of quantum mechanics and general relativity (with new effects
that can be calculated in situations that are near to usual situations).
2. Individual play and collective norms of angels (that is the physics with
its humanitarian aspects).
3. Calculation of above structure from its closing on human being and society.
4. Cooperation with angels (new effects without any today limits).
As result we have the following algorithm of construction of new physics:
1. We write down ideals for initial dynamics (aesthetic, philosophical,
mystical principles).
2. We write down observability demands (conditions for life and consciousness).
3. Those two sets of demands are connected through closing on a global structure.
4. The condition of existence of this closing give us equations for initial dynamics.
5. Solving those equations we find out as initial so observable dynamics.
6. New observable dynamics give us new apparatus and procedures.
7. In that way we can construct not only lows of physics but also its language.
8. It turns out to be a new language that is above different realms of culture.
9. Then new physics generate not only today physics but also other realms of culture.
Ideals and demands are contradictory but are connected through global structures.
That is a stringent condition on initial dynamics. Taking ideals, demands, structures
from traditions and putting them in above algorithm we would have a unique initial
dynamics for deriving observable (our) new physics.
This derivation has four steps. Every step take into account one of above four global
structures (or Names). Every step has its own revelation and its own meaning of life.
Through derived physics (that is identical to norms of Names dialogue) four Names
take part in dialogue that end in last (now unknown) meaning.
As pre-requisite for all that we need here new language and new state of mind. They
are constructed (by procedure of symmetrization that is analogous to time-symmetrization)
from languages and states of mind of different realms of life and culture.
Those languages and states are related through procedures that are analogous to
symmetry breaking and to coverings (procedures of constructing the generators). Ideals
and demands unite all levels of initial dynamics in a unique structure depending on the
observer. It is the science (theory, experiment, experience) not only for matter but also for
humanitarian aspects of physics.
New languages and new states of mind can be playing out by a group of actors or by one person with some means for collectivization his acts. Here we need high level of introspection that must be spontaneous. That is the form of future’s science.
Here the language of science and the language, say, of art generate each other. From the point of view of art, science is a means to minimize the expense on translation in dialogue of Names. From scientific point of view, art is a means to regulate the dynamics of a set of different way of action. Below I’ll describe the syncretic language for this situation and algorithm of deriving the relations between different realms of culture.
With described above algorithm physics will be derived in four steps by repeating this algorithm on every step.
On every step we have a kind of revelation because on every step a simple consideration generate a great number of different consequences. Those detailed consequences generate wonderful new possibilities.
Every step has its own:
ideals (the last heavenly meaning)
demands (the last meaning from human point of view)
living force (for me).
The first step – “the general theory of everything in term of today physics” – illustrate the general mechanism of generation of physics.
The second step – “the right language of physics” –describe the dependence of physics on our psyche.
The third step – “the right state of mind” – ensure the meaningfulness of all endeavor
The fours step – “the last meaning of the World” – point out procedures for going out of time and matter.
All features of steps 1-3 follows from this last meaning but to explain mechanisms that are working here I start from the simplest first step.

Step 1. New physics in terms of today physical language.
----------------------------------------------------------

Physical abstract.
----------------------

Below you’ll find new rules for solving equations of classical physics that are
symmetric in two signs of time. Two symmetric halves of those rules are tightly
connected - that is a new demand on physics. This demand generate many
features of our physics (as example, all quantum mechanics) and after
taking into account this demand for other oppositions we would have
all physics without using any experimental data. Lows and procedures
of physics follow from principles and structures of above-mentioned
connections.
I'll start from classical physics because it is well known,
but I don't think it to be something basic and after explaining the
mechanisms that are working here I'll start from something more meaningful.
The questions that will be answered:
What is the using of time-symmetry in physics?
It is a means to derive all our physics.
What is the using of time-symmetry in our practice?
In time-symmetric physics we have many new effects - in particular, the
possibility of going out of time and matter.
What is time-symmetric system of reference?
The restoration of time-symmetric World is a complex problem that
need to reveal the relation of physics to other realms of life and culture.
What is the higher meaning of time-symmetry?
We are bother with stability and fight for existence but the destination
of our Universe is to go from Nothing and to return to Nothing. That is passable
only through perfect time-symmetry.

Physical introduction.
--------------------------
It is assumed in physics that any theory must be compared to
experiment and then turn out to be right or wrong. But actually
experimental setting are formed by theory and because of that we
a vicious circle. To break this circle I put fofward some additional
demands on any physical theory:
any pair of oppositions must be tightly connected on the
levels of initial dynamics
and must be independent on observable level.
As example of those oppositions I take two signs of time.
The basic equations of physics are the same for any sign of
time but on observable level we have the world with a definite arrow
of time. Actually there are two arrows of time:
in electrodynamics - that is the rule for choosing the
solution of Maxwell equations.. This rule was discussed
by Tetrode, Wheeler and Feynman and by many others.
in statistical physics - that is the sign of time derivation in
Boltzman equation. This sign was discussed by
Boltzman, Poincare and by many others.
It is clear that simultaneous change of any of above arrows
for all physical variables don't change any thing. Then there are
four worlds compatible with the lows of today physics:
horizon entropy index
expanded increased <
expanded decreased /
contracted decreased >
contracted increased \
Those four worlds are the same from the point of view of
internal observer but for a common observer (it will be defined later on)
we would have four types of solutions of Maxwell equations for an
electron moving with velocity v at a distance r:

A=f(v,r) A=f(v,-r)
A=f(-v,r) A=f(-v,-r)

and four type of Boltzman equations (d – time derivative, I –shtoss
term):
(d-v)f=I (d-v)f= - I (d+v)f=I (d+v)f= - I

All that is trivial but we would have something nontrivial
if we assume that those
FOUR WORLD INTERACT THROUGH
A COMMON METRICS.
A COMMON POBABILITY FOR A PARTICLE TO GO
FROM ONE WORLD TO ANOTHER.
COMMON APPARATUS FOR MEGUREMENTS.
Those points will be explained in more details in the main text.
As example, lagrangian of classical electrodynamics for zero mass electron:
L=EE-HH+euA
would take the form:
L =EE-HH+euA+EE-HH+euA+EE-HH+euA+EE-HH+euA
<< << << / / / / / / >> >> >> \ \ \ \ \ \
here all operators depend on a common metrics g . This metrics
enter through covariant derivations and through rules for multiplication.
Indexes <, /, >, \ point to one of above four solutions.
For this lagrangian we must calculate:
the ground state of the Universe,
the ground state of any electron,
the equations of motion for those ground states.
In usual situations those equations turn out to be identical
to quantum mechanics and general relativity. But there are many situations
where new effects are revealed.
To solve equations that follow from above lagrangian I exclude
all fields (solving the Maxweell equations). Then variation on g gives me
Einstein equations and I solve them in linear approximation. Now lagrangian depend only on trajectory x(t) of ground state of electron.
I derive equations for x(t) and solve them. The solution depends
on coordinates of center of gravity of trajectory. Equation for those
coordinates turn out to be Dirac equation
(for usual situations, not for all).
Then quantum mechanics and general relativity (with all their
constants) are formal
mathematical consequences of above lagrangian. This result seem to be
strange because we
didh't see in above lagrangian anything similar to quantum mechanics
and general relativity. Then I start from a qualitative explanation.
Calculations (not simple) will be
discussed later on.
It is not enough to write down this lagrangian: we must point
also the system of reference and procedures of mesuarements. That is the
complex task because the world of symmetric observer exist in higher realm
of life and culture. We must define the procedures of going from physics to
this higher realms and backward. This procedures have many important
consequencies for above non physical realms - then we can
discuss them and manipulate them only through language and emotions
of those higher realms.

2. The response from the Universe.
-------------------------------------------

The above lagrangian I assume
for N particles in the form of reified plasma on the background of
a cosmological model and of a local metrics. That note is important
because with two signs of time any small movement will generate the
retarded waves that after scattering on the distant matter of the Universe
will transformed (through common metrics) to advanced waves that return to
the source of radiation in the same place at the same moment of time. That
is the response from the Universe. This response (or loops in time) has
many wonderful consequences besides quantum mechanics and general
relativity.
Then I am looking for ground state of this
N-particle system. The ground state of an electron turn out to
be not Newton's electron at rest but a complex trajectory in the
field of radiation emitted by the same trajectory and scattered
on distant matter of the Universe.

3. New characteristics of any trajectory.
-------------------------------------------------

For above lagrangian we must define the set of trajectories. Because
of zero mass of electron I'll assume for those trajectories any number
of turning points in time. To all this points I'll attach a probability of
transition from one world to another. Then we have here
high degree of arbitrariness - but condition of stability of ground
state determine those probabilities in a unique way.
Now trajectory x(t) and dispersion y(t) would be
multivalued functions of t .
Turning points in electrodynamics arrow for x(t)
will be different from turning points in statistical arrow for y(t).
If D, D, D, D - number of particles in four worlds
for a trajectory with dispersion, we would have through them
a simple expression for wave function:
Psy=D+D+D+D
< / > \
The system of four equations for those D in the field of response
from the Universe can be rewriting as one equation for this wave
function - this equations turn out to be Dirac equations,
Psy turn out to be two-valued spinor.

4. Two types of response.
------------------------

We can have some response from the distant matter of the Universe only
for waves without any dumping.If we write down the condition of absence
of dumping we find out two solutions:
1.frequency Q that is near to Compton
frequency (dynamical response) and
2.frequency N\(1/2)Q - chaotic response.
Because of chaotic response Psy(x,v) turn out to be Psy(x).
Classical kinetics takes the form of quantum mechanics.

5. The role of gravitational waves.
-------------------------------------

Here the constant of interaction of gravitational waves with matter for
undamping frequency turn out to be much greater (N\0,5) than in usual gravity. The equilibrium of circles is determined by balance of electromagnetic and gravitational forces.
Under those forces four particles from four different worlds are united in tetrade and are moving along a common circle. Those tetrades we observe as electrons.
6.The character of ground state.
----------------------------

The trajectory of the ground state of any electron has the form of a circle
with four particles from four worlds moving around this circle. Here
gravitational repulsion is counterbalancing by attraction generated by response
from the Universe. This response is calculated for particles in the same ground
states. Gravitation is the result of elasticity of waves generating by all ground
states of the Universe.
Coordinates that enter equations of quantum mechanics are starkly different from
coordinates that enter initial lagrangian written above.


7. Some mathematical assumptions.
--------------------------------

Equations that follow from above lagrangian turn out to be unusually
complex. Instead of solving them I take some intuitively appealing may be
solutions and pass them through these equations. In some case I have
proved stability of this solutions. Then my derivation has some
deficiencies but all this deficiencies can be removed without any
new physical assumptions, through some additional calculations.

8.Derivation of all today physics.
--------------------------------------

Above algorithm can be repeated for more deep levels of initial physics
and more deep global structures. Those structures are part of the general
plan of the World that is derived from the picture of dialogue of Names
- or dialogue of four civilizations:
Jew, Hindu, Greek. Chinese.
Here we can derive not only physics but also other realms of life and culture.
Through this derivation we can prove the correctness of initial dynamics (or picture)
- then we would actually derive physics from other realm of culture.

9. New effects.
------------------

In this new physics there are many situations where new effects
and revealed. The most interesting of them turn out to be dependent
on environment, on the personal and collective state of mind, on
the program of evolution (the above mentioned plan of the World is a part
of this program). To take those dependencies into account we must
have high level of understanding of and an experience of living in different ancient
and modern traditions.

Step 1. Discussion.
------------------------
Here the main passion is the passion for allknowledge. As result we have here the general theory of everything in today sense of this notion.
This theory was revealed to me thirty years ago when I had derived electrodynamics from some topological considerations. This electrodynamics turns out to be time-symmetric and I was trying to remove advanced waves trough Wheeler-Feynman mechanism. At that time I was living in the country and didn’t have Wheeler-Feynman paper. I had decided to repeat their calculation but erroneously (rightly in heavenly sense) change sign of time not only for waves (as in Wheeler-Feynman) but also for particles. And unexpectedly I get not only exclusion of advanced waves but NEWTON EQUATION, QUANTUM MECHANICS, GRAVITATION with right magnitude of physical constants.
Later on I understand that I unconsciously put in my derivation:
1. Heavenly principles of coincidence of oppositions.
Actually it is the condition of regulation of our Universe from other realms.
2. Closing of local physics on global dynamics of the Universe.
That is the condition of generation of physics from something non-material
with return to this source at the end of times.
3. Our striving for stability (as a condition for existence).
That condition ensure our role as translators in dialogue of Names.
But what is genesis of all that?
This question I have answered many years later through another revelation:
UNITY OF NAMES is the last meaning of our World.
It is not a simple thing to explain what this notion mean and in what way it works.
The theory of everything (in today sense) that we have on step1 usually assumed to
be the end of science but actually it is only a beginning because many new questions arose:
1. We have time-symmetric description – what is our system of reference?
3. The closing on the Universe is the symmetry breaking with great number of particles. The resulting dynamics turn out to be practically independent of initial dynamics – then why I take for initial physics the language of classical physics?
4. There are in new physics situations where formally we have new space-times, not connected to our usual space-time. Then in what way can we speak about them?
Those questions will be answered on the next steps of derivation of physics.

Step 2. The closing of physics on observer.
----------------------------------------------------

Abstract of step 2.
---------------------

In the first step I have discovered the closing of local physical dynamics on global dynamics of the Universe as a whole. The closing on observer is more evident: if physics pretend to be complete it must describe the behavior of observer – but all that physics is in the mind of observer! The problem of step 2 is the dynamics of that mind.
In comparison to step 1 here we don’t know not only the laws but also the language. Then I’ll repeat the above algorithm (or construction) now as demands for language. The only solution will be not mathematics but the language of art!

Introduction to step 2.
--------------------------

If you have understood the logic of step 1 you yourself can made the next step. But really it is not a simple matter and I’ll start from the answer:
Behind physics we have a society of “animal souls” which I’ll name phusons (from Greek name for nature – but here we have the soul of nature). The main passion of those entities is the passion for play and in interest of this play they can unite in-groups. Then in some situations we would have here spontaneous generation of collective norms that in other situations can disappear. Those norms we can explain as result of the fight for existence but they are a consequence of demands for translation along the dialogue of Names. I’ll show that in some cases those norms are identical to our physics. The notion of number and geometry are absent in initial dynamics, they will be derived. The “lagrangian” has the form:
1. Rules of this play (as ideal – without any rule).
2. Procedures that put us near to phusons state of mind (to simulate phusons).

The phusonic lagrangian.
------------------------------
At step 1 we have lagrangian with different configuration of fields and particles for world +t and world –t but with common metrics for those worlds. At the next step I’ll assume the metrics also is different but assume that those completely different configurations are generated by the dynamics of the same team of phusons. Then we must write down the lagrangian in the term of phusonic dynamics and assume physical dynamics of worlds +t and –t to be a result of symmetry breaking.
But there are another kinds of symmetry breaking: our emotional dynamics revealed in art. Through meditation on the internal contradictions in the most deep works of art we can come out on the level of phusons and on this level can play out different symmetry breaking.
Then here a compendium of the works of art defines “lagrangian”.
Some details. It can be seen from step 1 that lows of physics are generated by relations between +t and –t worlds and by apparatus for measurement. Those relations can be derived from closing on phusons society that, according to general plan of the world (see the beginning of this text) generate both above worlds. Those apparatus can be derived from closing on observer. I have explained above why phusonic society can not be described by mathematics and why we need here higher languages. The nearest of those languages is the language of art. Ideals and principles of art determine the concrete form of lagrangian.
All that procedures for opposition +t and –t must be repeated for opposition between objective and subjective modes of description.

Discussion of step 2.
-------------------------

The concrete structure of above “lagrangian” is the result of two revelations.
The first revelation has place when I decided to elucidate the notion of levels of organization. For any natural systems I take two characteristics that I assume to be most important: complexity and the flow of energy through system. Those notions have some non-trivial definitions that are complex but are the same for all levels of organization. As result I have get on a list of paper the beautiful picture
that I assume to be projection of the Name of God on the natural world.
I name this picture “general plan of the World”.
There are many similarities between different parts of this picture. Those similarities ensure minimum of expense for procedure of creation (or translation). Because any pattern repeats itself many times, we can make many predictions trough those analogies. That is why I name this picture revelation.
Through those analogies we can restore complete picture of our World from the known part of evolution. Actually we have here not only analogies but also complex system of relations trough higher realms. If we know these relations, we know all - but if we know only some analogies, we must for details turn to described above algorithm.
From those analogies we can see the world that generate our material Universe – it turn out to be the world of phusons, angels, will of God.
This world of phusins we can take as initial dynamics for described in introduction the algorithm of closing on some global structure – now it is the structure of observer. Actually we must repeat all story of step 1 but now instead of retarded and advanced waves we would have perceptions and actions, instead ofUniverse we would have psyche of individual observer.
On observable level instead the passion for stability we would have the passion for fullness of life.
But actually we can speak here only about projections of phusons, angels, will of God on scientific world. On this level of description we can formulate all ideals, demands and image of observer in terms of natural philosophy or in systemic language, but here
WE DON’T HAVE SOLUTION IN TERM OF LANGUAGE OF SCIENCE.
And this solution will be improbable in most degree if we’ll formulate ideals, demands, and image of observer in terms of art – that is the most natural choice of language.
Then to have right description we must go to language that can generate both languages we need: language of art and language of science. It can not be identical to known language of art, because of evident deficiency of this language: matemathics is not a part of it.
Then there are four causes not to take mathematics as a right language of physics:
ideals, demands, closing on observer actually described in non-mathematical languages. But even they would have a formal description as conditions for a right language, those equations for language don’t have any solutions in mathematics.
And here I had revelation about the language that is needed.
That language can be constructed in the same manner as time-symmetric language at step 1, now art and science take the role of world +t and world –t. But now we don’t know the language that can relate art and science, i.e. we don’t know the language of initial dynamics in described above algorithm. The idea is to take as a trial language the language of mysticism, because mysticism pretend to describe generation as the art so the science. The special technique for going from usual art and science to their mystical generators is near to some ancient techniques..
Now we know the language, the structure (from closing the initial dynamics on deep I of observer), the analogue of metrics in above lagrangian (that is the realm of regulation taken from general plan of the world). This syncretic
regulation form a landshaft for phusons and conditions of existence for physical loops. This regulation will be calculated on step 3.
The knowledge of higher dynamics if important not only for relations of worlds with different signs of time but also for situations where response from the Universe is counterbalanced by some local contraction or/ and pumping. Through those situations we have centers of regulation of dynamics of matter by higher realms. The problems that arose here are usual problems of evolution. Because this picture is an output of the same evolution we have here a loop. With knowledge of this loop (as a part of higher dynamics) we can consciously change the path of evolution, can construct other loops of the same kind and so on.
To construct the relations of different physical worlds through higher dynamics we can start from different part of our usual world. Then we can go to more informative relations, more distant part of the Universe, new worlds - they can yet exist or can be invented.

Step 3: How to calculate the picture of angelic life.

Abstract of step 3.
----------------------

The next step of symmetrization is evident: phusons of different worlds can be different but they can be parts of one society united by a common ideology, i.e. common religion. Then step 3 is repeated on new level.

Angelic lagrangian.
----------------------

Here we must repeat procedure of going from physics to phusons for the next step: going from phusons to society of angels. Ideals and demands of religion determine the concrete form of lagrangian. Beside four main civilizations we have four different kinds of angels.
As above, we can add here new opposition: the necessity to speak with God without knowing his moral norms.

Introduction to step 3.
--------------------------

There is an interesting feature of Part 1 physics: for every natural system
(in particular, human beings and society) we have a local space with a local cosmology (and with a local society of angels). A part of above mentioned local structures -the system of regulations of human perceptions and actions. It is clear that we can now calculate (or play out) all features of this structure.
Different realms of culture will be different kind of symmetry breaking of the same angelic dynamics. Then we have relations of different kinds of culture trough this common dynamics. If we take art, religion, mysticism to be given, we can derive physics from this humanitarian aspects.

An illustration to step 3.
----------------------------

Below is apart of blessing preceding main Judaic prayer:
“…angels…stand in the heights of the universe and reverently proclaim in unison, aloud, the words of living God and everlasting King. All of them are beloved, all of them are pure, all of them are mighty; they all perform with awe and reverence the will of their Creator; they all open their mouth with holiness and purity, with song and melody, while they bless and praise, glorify and reverence, sanctify and acclaim –
the Name of the great, mighty and revered God and King; holy is he. They all accept the rule of the kingdom of heaven, ONE FROM THE OTHER, GRANTING PERMISSION TO ONE ANOTHER to hallow their Creator. In serene spirit, with pure speech and sacred melody, they all exclaim in unison and with reverence:
Holy, holy, holy is the Lord of hosts;
The hole earth is full of his glory.”
(Isaiah 6:3)
Here I point by initial letter the words that speak about the loops, the closing. Those loops send us to other dynamics: angels as individuals (or phusons – they became angels through social interaction, through those loops) and to higher regulation that ensure necessity of loops.
The same relations to nearby levels we have for any other level.
The loops are conditions for symmetry breaking and transition to new ground state. As result of those symmetry breaking we have a system of norms. This system need regulators, those regulators need norms and so on. As result we have a picture of evolution. The necessity of loops follows from dialogue of Names and the role of angels as mechanisms of translation one Name in other.
That is a scientific description (i.e. projection) of a religious picture. This projection can not explain the multitude of those projections, can not explain the beginning and the end of any projection. Then we must turn to dynamics of higher level. It follows from general plan of the World that language of one of those levels is identical to religious language (and emotions, and state of mind).
Then above text of Isaiah we can take as generator of many scientific pictures of the same kind. And not as “primitive description of true scientific picture”. Here all details of sacred history are important and much more important are interpretations of those details, because from those interpretations we have detailed picture of sacred dynamics. This dynamics explain our physics and generate many other physics with their worlds.
Then we must use the culture of religious interpretation that work only for right state of mind, right state of living and so on.

Step 4. The complete description of new effects.
---------------------------------------------------------

Abstract to step 4.
----------------------

The next step of time-symmetrization is evident: different civilizations (actually different collective state of mind) are united in the last picture of dialogue of Names. That picture has many projections on different parts of natural and cultural evolution. That projections turn out to be selfclosed, then we can assume the unity of Names also to be selfclosed.
From this picture we have complete description of all effects connected with two signs of time.

Lagrangian of Names.
--------------------------

Here, as in preceding steps we must start from dynamics of Names that is described by the language of last sense (or last meanings). As example, we can take dynamics of hexagrams (in Chinese mysticism) or dynamics of sefirots (in Jewish mysticism). Usual ideals and demands of known mystical systems determine the concrete form of lagrangian.
Then all must be repeated for new opposition: the necessity to speak about something (a mystical system) that can not be expressed in any way.

Introduction to step 4.
--------------------------

As the first approximation to the picture of the Unity of Names we can take four
main civilizations with their mystical systems and their language For any situation we have here the additional demand:
we must ensure the minimal
expence on translation. That translation can be modeled as procedure of meditation – the expense can be evaluated as time that needed here. For evolution it may be evaluated as number of elementary acts. This expense depend on the character of
angelic society, this character
depend on our personal and social state of mind (the angelic
norms are closing on this state).
Then effects that, in particular, ensure going out of time
and matter turn out to be dependent
on state of our mind. With those relations to angels we can
solve many our problems..
Before going to experiment we must derive from above
picture all realms of life and culture
with their evolution - then we can trust this picture. I must
to note that we have here not
"the God of scientists and philosophers" and not an abstract
"observer" but full traditions of art and religion.
It is hard to understand all that without effectively
working examples but any example
would have the form of playing out the artistic, religious,
mystical texts and its description
need much space. The structure of this play ensure complete
emotional engrossing of any player
and ensure absence of motives and emotions connected with
our time, space, matter. Language
of play must be the language of coincidence of oppositions (that
ensure connections to the system of regulation).
An example of this language is
described above in the form of mathematics symmetrical in +t and -t .
The new right physics is a system of norms (calculated or
selected through try-out) that
ensure all above demands. The state of mind that needed here is
near to what traditionally prized
as deep and high. Then all ancient heritage is working here.

Discussion of step 4.
------------------------

The text above was constructed around four oppositions (only first was discussed in details). Those four steps we can see on general plan of the world as four main links of the way of evolution and four main steps inside every link. But every two nearby levels are connected by a multitude of small transitions (or symmetry breaking), that can be seen, as example, on the tree of biological evolution as emergence of a new species.
Our going to the level above any of before mentioned oppositions actually change all notions of initial language and can generate new notions. If we have many oppositions and want to go beyond all them we would see interaction of those many moving in any notion. This system of interacting generators of different oppositions forms the dynamics of higher level. The dynamics of movement from Big Bung to redemption through four steps described above is analogous
to actual evolution of nature and culture as we know it.
But now we can go to more deep level of description. The dynamics of this level is constructed from known part of evolution. But we can extend this higher dynamics to the future and can derive from this extension details of the way to redemption.
Then we must take this way – this will be redemption.
Here we have a hierarchy of experimental settings (some of them very simple and inexpensive) from dependence of mass on some moving in near environment to the whole redemption.

Why can we trust all that?
-------------------------------

To trust me you must follow all my argument and spent
much time - you'll not do this
without trust. But there are another simple arguments:
1. Signs of revelation.
Thirty years ago I have trying to repeat Wheeler-Feynman
calculation of the response of
the Universe for time-symmetric electrodynamics but
unconsciously I had changed the sign
of time not only for waves but also for electrons.
And on a half of a page in a half-hour I have get Newton
equation, de Brogle waves, low of gravitation with right
magnitude of electron and proton
mass, Plank constant, gravitational constant.
There is another simple line line of arguments:
Theory must be compared to experiment and then turn out to be right or
wrong. But actually the experimental setting depend on theory
and because of that we have a vicious circle.
Having all that in mind and moving by passion for symmetry
I have invented new variant of classical
electrodynamics. Instead of usual lagrangian for a particle with zero mass
L=EE-HH+euA
(here E , H , A - field, u - velocity. All operation depend on metrics)
I take
L=EE-HH+euA+EE-HH+euA
<< << < >> >> >
were
E , H , A - retarded field, E , H , A
- advanced field.
< < < > > >
This lagrangian I assume for N particles in the form of reified plasma

on the background of a cosmological model and a local metrics.
Then I am looking for the ground state of this system.
This ground state for any electron turn out to be not Newton's electron
at rest but a complex trajectory
in the field of radiation emitted by the same trajectory and scattered on

distant matter of the Universe.
The dynamics of centers of gravity of those ground states turn out to
be identical to quantum mechanics
and general relativity.
In distinction to usual classical mechanics here coordinates (y) of
particles that enter above lagrangians
differ from coordinates (x) of centers of gravity that are objects of
measurements.
Then we have as result of calculation of scattering of waves on
distant matter of the Universe
x=f(y)
I start from a concrete form of this function, it depends on
initial dynamics and procedures of measurement. I start assuming it to be given but actually those
two elements are arbitrary. I.e. in new physics we have many new
restrictions (and new results) but also have some arbitrariness.
That arbitrariness disappears after the next three steps. The procedure is repeated at next steps and give us relations of resulting language to initial language. discussion. To this
general idea I must add some notes.
(1).Because of zero mass of electron we must take into account in
above lagrangian also trajectories with turning points in time.
Then for any trajectory at any moment of time we would have
a number D of retarded
and a number D of advanced particles. The above lagrangian take the form <
L=EE-HH+euA+EE-HH+euA
<< << << >> >> >>
Then we have two worlds: completely retarded and completely
advanced interacting through a common metrics.
(2).Actually we have beside electromagnetic arrow of time also the
statistical arrow. This second arrow
for waves has the meaning of two direction (from the source and to
the source) and for particles has the
meaning of two passable signs of time derivation in Boltzmann equation.
Then we have lagrangian:
L=EE-HH+euA+EE-HH+euA+EE-HH+euA+EE-HH+euA
<< << << > >> >> // // // \\ \\ \\
where we have indexes :
< - for retarded causal world
> - for advanced causal world
/ - for retarded anticausal world
\ - for advanced anticausal world.
There is a simple expression for wave function of electron through
four types of dencities:
Psy=(D-D)+i(D-D)
< > / \
(3).The above lagrangian don't have the usual term for kinetic energy
of electron but after calculation of the
scattering of waves on the distant matter of the Universe we would have
this term with right magnitude of
the mass of electrons.
(4).The above lagrangian don't have Einstein term for metrics but after
calculation the scattering we would
have this term with right magnitude of gravitational constant.
Then in above examples we have all from Nothing.
2. Here natural systems differ from artificial systems. Then we have removed the great deficiency of our today physics: in our physics human being is only a complex of elementary particles.
In new physics we have new effects that are great in natural systems but
are practically absent in ourtoday apparatus.
3. Here we can, in principle, reveal the meaning of minute details of
our environment.
If we want to have such details we must put in our theory (as system of
ideals and demands for initial
dynamics ) not only the general image of God and observer (that is enough
only for today physics) but as prts of derivation of physics the derivation of
details of our environment and
full texts of religious and artistic traditions (with all their emotions).
I remind you that in today physics we don't have any hint to above
three points. Then we have here three
great leaps - that is too important, productive, interconnected
to have any error.
If somebody is interested I can send derivation of quantum
mechanics (40 pages) after request and after
the proof of some understanding of this introduction. In the same
manner I can send derivation of physics
(300pages) and if somebody pass through all that he can come to
me to discuss new physics (2000 pages).

<<PREVIOUS             NEXT>>

<<TO CONTENT

upward

directNIC Search
Hosted by directNIC.com