25.  Another basic interactions

That is the end of derivation of quantum mechanics from classical electromagnetism and gravitation. It seems at first sight that other basic interactions do not take part in this derivation because of a short range of their interaction. Can we speak with this short range about the response from the distant matter of the universe?

The answer is: Yes, we can. As an initial dynamics inside our four worlds we can take the dynamics where all nonlinear terms and all masses of mesons are equal zero. The same dynamics we have on the undumping frequency  – then we have a connection to distant matter of the universe.

For  this dynamics will be changed through the interaction with the usual vacuum of quantum field theory. This renormalization generates nonlinear terms and masses of mesons (from the masses of fermions). Here we have some unknown solutions uniting the fields from different worlds. These solutions are similar to the whirlwind of Fig. 16. The interactions forming these solutions can be determined by the usual demands on Yang – Mills fields or on metrics.

I have not finished these calculations but a tentative estimation gives for the Planck constant the expression (I put all the coefficients near to 1 to be 1):

where     – the strength of electromagnetic interaction;

               – the strength of strong interaction;

               – the strength of fundamental interaction.

The approach described above changes many problems of quantum field theory. For example, we can solve the problem of the nature of Higgs field.

The Higgs field was invented to get mass for massless fields. In the above theory all fields are initially massless and acquire mass also through some field. But here it is not a new field – it is an inevitable (in the theory of interacting perfect worlds) response from the universe.

We have seen in Section 9 that electrical strength  of this response is proportional to acceleration

                                                                                                      (102)

From the condition of equilibrium in an external field .

we have

Hence the coefficient m is the usual mass.

After taking into account the turning points in time we have for the lagrangian of response

here  is the velocity of rotation around the circle.

From (102)

                                                                                                    (103)

and we have the lagrangian

          .

Here “Higgs field” is the response .

If we have a nonlinear equation, say

          ÿ                                                                                        (104)

we can put

                                                                                                    (105)

where  is a solution

          ÿ .

Here we have not an usual solution, but a solution generated by the field of the response from the universe. Putting (105) in (104) we have for small

          ÿ                                                                                      (106)

If a is the size of solution and  is the frequency, we would have as in (103):

and from (106):

          ÿ .

The mass of meson is smaller than the mass of hadron because of the factor .

I hope to change these estimations to correct calculations in the near future.

It is clear that for nonlinear fields taking into account the response from the universe is not identical to the usual quantization.

In quantum gravitation we have, in general, regions that are disconnected from the usual response from the universe. Hence the usual quantization can not work here. The assumptions of this chapter are also inadequate here. This problem will be solved in the next chapters.

In the above derivation of quantum mechanics I used the assumption that the gravitational constant at the frequency  is  times greater than the usual gravitational constant. In Section 11 I described the estimated derivation of this fact and of the gravity itself. The proper derivation of these two circumstances will be given in one of the next chapters.

Rigidity of the circles discussed in Section 23 is actually not absolute and depends on frequency. For the frequency  we have new quantum mechanics that explains the act of measurement and puts a natural cutoff in quantum field theory.  This second quantum mechanics will be described in one of the next chapters.

In all the above calculations I put the temperature to be zero. I did not use openly any statistics. But actually the statistics inside the union of the four worlds must be derived anew and this derivation is analogous to the derivation of quantum mechanics. Here I can demonstrate wonderful new effects that form a basis for understanding the role of life and consciousness in physics. That is also the topic of one of the next chapters.

And lastly, the most interesting advancement of the above described approach: the physics of life and consciousness. Here I have solved the principal problems and hope to describe all that in details later on.

26.  Laws of physics are in our power

Long time ago I lived in the country trying to understand the nature of electromagnetism. I derived Maxwell theory from some topological considerations – not in the form of Maxwell equations but in the form of solutions of these equations.

The solutions naturally turned out to be symmetric in the two signs of time. Thinking about the problem of superfluous solutions I recalled the paper of Wheeler and Feynman [3] where they got rid of advanced waves taking into account the response from the universe.

I did not have their paper at hand and tried to reproduce it from memory. In half an hour the advanced waves disappeared but quite unexpectedly a number of new strange effects emerged.

They seemed to me similar to something, and after ten minutes I recognized this “something”: there were the masses of electron and proton, some elements of quantum mechanics, gravitation with definite values for . I wrote down the expressions for these constants and some days later, being in Moscow, I took a reference book. All the constants turned out to be correct within 10%!

All local physics turned out to be the result of expansion of the universe and in a smaller degree the result of dissipation on the scales of the universe.

Later on I understood the reason of all that: intuitively I took not two solutions but two worlds and not only the inverse direction of the arrow of time in these worlds but also the inverse direction of causality.

Two weeks later there was a day that I consider to be the beginning of a new world. A simple thought emerged in my mind: if the mass of any particle is the result of expansion of the universe, why not to cancel it out by some contraction of the near environment? What will be the parameters of this contraction?

The mass of the universe M that is expanding with the velocity of light (near the horizon R), must be counterbalanced by the contraction of mass m (radius r) with the velocity v. Then after comparison between those two contributions in the integral (52) we have:

That was my first estimation, and from this relation followed that neutralization of the expansion of the universe is possible for any amateur. This fact was important for me but after some time I realized that there are different types of loops (anticausal) that generate the same term as above but with different signs.

Then in the above relation we must take into account a factor  discussed in Section 3. As a result, we have (<< 1):

This relation can hold only for astrophysical objects. In the laboratory conditions special efforts and special equipment are needed.

In astrophysics, the difference of (52) from the usual constant mass generates many new phenomena. A simple estimation shows that the existent flows of matter from stars and galactic nuclei can change the mass of these objects 10-100-fold. This flow gives the correct distribution of “missing mass” along the radius of galaxies.

These flows change not only mass but also the repulsive potential of two hydrogen atoms. That is the cause of thermonuclear fusion and power in radio jets. It is clear that analogues of this source of energy (not only thermonuclear) we can arrange also in laboratory.

But apart from the expansion of the universe we have also the dissipation on the scales of the universe. The role of this dissipation for two signs of causality is the same as the role of expansion for two signs of time.

This dissipation is proportional to:

                    – density of particles in the universe;

                    –  cross section for scattering;

                   R – distance to horizon;

                   kT – mean energy of a photon.

Let us have in a region with the scale r such a pumping that effectively we have here the negative temperature T. Then the enhancing here can compensate the dumping over all the way to horizon. The condition of compensation:

Here  in usual substances is  but for the universe we have . This difference is near usual difference of r and R and because of that it is a simple matter to arrange this compensation.

This compensation is not something exotic: it takes place in any living system – that is a condition for life. But this topic is too vast to be touched here.

Then after some refinements of the above calculations I can construct an apparatus for going out of time and out of causality.

But actually these “refinements” turn out to be “the drama of ideas” that did not end till now. Though there was a number of other revelations – very interesting and completely unexpectable (they form the content of this chapter).

The most interesting revelation was the technique of constructing the general plan of the World.

It follows from this plan that physics can not tell us about the first cause: this is the realm of religion. According to Judaism, God created our world with the help of angels. What we know about the society of angels? According to Isaiah, they are praising The Creator appealing one to another. There must be some norms of their communication. It follows from the general plan of the World that we perceive these norms as the laws of physics.

Then we must start a hierarchy of basic interactions from angelic norms.

Here some people object: “Physics has nothing to do with religion.”

But I can derive physics from a religious picture of angels’ life. This physics turns out to be more powerful than today’s physics. That is also the proof of the reality of angels.

Those objections miss the main point of this work. The derivation of physics is not my final goal. My goal is to get through this derivation some new connections that can be transformed to new types of experiments. And more: to an apparatus that can return us to generators of physics. This was the topic of my work.

Then we can construct an apparatus that will bring us to angelic society. The problem is not about “reality” of this society but about the technique that is needed here. This topic is too complex to be discussed here.

In more details: after spending some energy and negentropy we can have in a small region any physics we like. If this new physics will be in accordance with the global program of evolution, than we would have an excess of energy and negentropy and this process will continue forever.

All this depends on our language, motives, state of consciousness and on our ability to change ourselves. From where can we take the right language, motives and so on? From the picture of natural and cultural evolution, from the general archetype behind all the revolutions of the past. I know some features of this archetype, but it is more valuable to have only one effectively working example.

The two signs of time, two signs of causality physics is precisely that example. This physics is taken not from experiment but from some aesthetic and mystical ideals. Then we can consider the effectiveness of this physics as divine approvement.

The first examples of these ideals are, of course, simple and do not deal with the most important of our ideals. But we can put any number of those ideals into the picture of angelic life, and from these ideals and from angelic functions we can derive our future physics. Those hypothetical functions can be proved of disproved by generating from them all the picture of natural and cultural evolution.

Here I have special techniques of constructing these functions (from higher spheres of culture) and of deriving physical procedures and apparatuses from them. I have such techniques (or revelations) in a general form but any further step requires much additional work. You can see this on the example of an ideal of two signs of time and two signs of causality. Here any new “details” turn out to be new paradigm.

27.  Experimentum crucis

According to the above section we can expect for practically all situations with pumping and inverse Gibbs distributions also a new phenomena: the inversion of causality. I did not finish all calculations that are needed here, but qualitatively the picture is clear. We can expect here a new collective state that is induced by the electromagnetic and gravitational waves on the frequency . These waves can not be directly observed, but we can assume that the collective state inverted in causality depends on the volume of the pumping region.

It is important that this region can have the form of two separated regions: the waves on the frequency  can go through any material without dissipation. If we would change the distance between two regions, we shall see dependence of the collective state on this distance though from the point of view of usual physics we can not have here any interaction between two regions.

This experiment was carried out by me with Rafail Arshansky and Alexey Strigachev in the laboratory of Prof. Isaac Lapidus (Department of Chemistry, the Hebrew University, Jerusalem).

As a region with a possible inverted causality we have taken a Belousov – Zhabotinsky-type reaction that was set by mixing equal volumes of three solutions:

1.                         0.20 M KIO₃  in  0.09 M H₂S O₄

2.                         0.15 M Malonic acid in 0.02 M MnSO₄ and 0.03% Starch

3.                          3.6 M H₂O₂ in H₂O

This reaction was initiated in a test tube with a volume of about 30 cm³ and in two small test tubes of about 2 cm³ each.

One small test tube was placed in a bigger test tube, the other was located outside at the distance about 70 cm (see Fig. 17).

Fig. 17. Experimental proof of the existence of the regions with inverted causality.

The period of oscillation () of the first test tube (1 on the Fig. 17) was the same as for the bigger test tube, but the period of oscillations of the second test tube (2 on the Fig. 17) turned out to be different ().

This phenomena seems to be strange because two small test tubes have the identical conditions from the point of view of usual physics.

But the invisible inverted regions for the test tubes 1 and 2 differ greatly in size. This factor can explain the observed difference in the periods of oscillation.

It is clear that this experiment can be repeated with any bacterial colony or tissue culture where we have the Belousov – Zhabotinsky oscillations.

In the human brain these oscillations may be depending on the emotional state of this human being (and may be on the state of other human being) in situations where the chemistry is the same (in this region). I.e. the difference in the emotional state can be discovered not through the chemistry but through the change of the period of oscillations.

Those effects (see Chapter 3) are the most interesting. I know the technique of calculating these effects, but only in principle, and I will not bring them up to concrete experimental setting.

In these experiments we could hear “the rustle of wings”, but the way to a meaningful angelic dialogue needs all techniques and apparatus that will be described in the next chapters.

Acknowledgments

At the end of this chapter my thanks to Rafail Arshansky, Volodya Sokolov, Yury Kucharenko, Olga Kouznetsova for help.

References

1.        Ryazanov G.V. Time-symmetric electrodynamics as generator of electron mass, quantum mechanics and gravitation. In: Sakharov Memorial Lectures in Physics, Nova Sci. Publ. 1992, v. 1, p. 2.

2.        Ryazanov G.V. Unexpected effects in the time-symmetric electrodynamics. Studies on history of physics and mechanics. M., Nauka, 1999, p. 176.

3.        Wheeler J.A., Feynman R.P. Interaction with the absorber as a mechanism of radiation. Rev. Mod. Phys., 17, 157 (1945).

4.        Sakharov A.D. Vacuum quantum fluctuations in curvilinear space and the theory of gravitation. DAN SSSR, 177, 70 (1967).

5.        Landau L.D., Lifshiz E.M. Theory of fields. M., 1993.

6.        Feynman R.P. A relativistic cut-off for classical electrodynamics. Phys. Rev., 74 [8], 939 (1948).

7.        Hoyle F., Narlikar J.V. Action at a distance in physics and cosmology. Freeman & Co., San Francisco, 1974.

8.        Kucharenko Yu.A. Quantum mechanics on the base of the only one principle. Studies on history of physics and mechanics. M., Nauka, 1997, p. 125.